




版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡(jiǎn)介
Artide
PoliticalStudies
Association
COVID-19andPoliticalTrustin
LocalGovernments:Evidence
FromNepal
CharlotteFiedlerlD,HugoMarcos-Marne2DandKarinaMross'D
PoliticalStudiesReview
l-18
◎TheAuthor(s)2024
Articlereuseguidelines:/journals-permissionsDOl:10.1177/14789299231220535 /home/psrev
Abstract
TheCOVID-19pandemichasreinvigorateddebatesaboutthedriversofpoliticaltrust.Researchsofarhasmainlyfocusedonnational-levelinstitutions,duringtheearlystagesofthepandemicandusingdatafromestablisheddemocracies.However,howdoesthisrelationshiplooklikeifwepayattentiontosubnationalinstitutionsinnon-consolidateddemocracies,andfurtherawayfromtheinitialCOVID-19outbreak?Tocontributetothislineofresearch,thisarticlefocusesonthelocallevelandexplorestheassociationbetweenindividuals'satisfactionwithCOVID-19performanceandpoliticaltrustinNepal.Forthat,itusesnoveldatacollectedviatelephoneinterviews(N=1400)conductedbetween25Apriland24May2021,duringthesecondwaveofCOVID-19.Ourmainresultsrevealthatsatisfactionwithlocalinstitutions'COVID-relatedperformanceissignificantlyandrobustlyassociatedwithlevelsofpoliticaltrustatthelocallevel.Theassociationholdsevenwhengeographicalandtimespecificationsareadded,trusttowardsnationalinstitutionsorexpectationsaboutlocalgovernmentsareincludedintheanalysisandthedependentvariableisdisaggregatedtodiscardmeasurementbiases.Thestudytherebyprovidesimportantinsightsintotheroleperformanceplaysforinstitutionaltrustbeyondthenationallevelandinanunconsolidateddemocracy.
Keywords
politicaltrust,crises,Nepal,locallevel,COVID-19
Accepted:21November2023
Introduction
Throughouttheworld,governmentshavestruggledwithrespondingtotheCOVID-19pandemic,seeingthemselvesforcedtoimplementunpopularmeasuressuchaslock-downsorsocialdistancing.Asthehealthcrisishadamassiveimpactonpeople'slives
'ResearchProgrammeonTransformationofPolitical(dis-)order,GermanInstituteofDevelopmentandSustainability,Bonn,Germany
2DemocracyResearchUnit,AreaofPoliticalScience,UniversidaddeSalamanca,Salamanca,Spain
Correspondingauthor:
CharlotteFiedler,GermanInstituteofDevelopmentandSustainability,53113Bonn,Germany.Email:charlotte.fiedler@idos-research.de
2PoliticalStudiesReview00(
0)
andrequiredlarge-scaleandoftendrasticgovernmentmeasures,itoffersanexceptionalopportunitytoinvestigatethelinkbetweengovernmentperformanceandtrust,akeyquestioninpoliticalscienceresearch.Theviruskepttheworldinsuspenseandmanygovernmentmeasuressubstantiallyimpactedonpeople’slives,whichfacilitatedahighawarenessofthesituation,increasinginturntheoddsthatpeoplewillhaveformedanopiniononhowsatisfiedtheyarewiththeresponse(i.e.thatpeopletrulyassesshowgovernmentsperformedinthissituation,ratherthanusingheuristics).
Whilepoliticaltrusthasbeenusedsuccessfullytoexplaincompliancewithanti-coronameasures,theeffectsoftheCOVID-19pandemiconpoliticaltrustarestillunderdiscus-sion(Devineetal.,2021).Thisgrowingfieldhasproducedvaluableinsights,butstudiessofarfocusalmostexclusivelyonthenationallevel,although,inmanycountries,subna-tionalgovernmentunitsplayedanimportantroleindesigningandimplementinggovern-mentresponses(DuttaandFischer,2020;HirschfeldandThielsch,2022).Furthermore,moststudiesanalyselevelsoftrustinWesterndemocraciesfollowingtheearlystagesofthepandemic(seeforexampleBoletal.,2020;Kritzingeretal.,2021;Schraff,2020).
OurstudyusestheCOVIDpandemicasanexceptionalopportunitytocontributetoresearchonpoliticaltrustbyleveragingontherelevanceofgovernmentactionamidthissituationofcrisis.Indoingso,wegobeyondpreviousresearchbylookingat(1)therolethepandemicplayedforpoliticaltrustinlocalgovernments;(2)analysingtherelation-shipduringthesecondwaveofthepandemic,whencitizens’havehadtimetoknowandassessgovernmentperformance;and(3)investigatingthislinkintheemergingdemoc-racyofNepal.
Drawinguponnoveldatafromanoriginalphonesurveyconductedwith1400respond-entsinNepal,ouranalysisshowsthatsatisfactionwithlocalinstitutions’COVID-relatedperformanceissignificantlyandrobustlyassociatedwithhigherlevelsofpoliticaltrustatthelocallevel.Theassociationholdsevenwhengeographicalandtimespecificationsareadded,trusttowardsnationalinstitutionsorexpectationsaboutlocalgovernmentsareincludedintheanalysisandthedependentvariableisdisaggregatedtodiscardmeasure-mentbiases.
Thearticleisstructuredasfollows:aftertheintroduction,wediscussthecurrentstateofresearchandourtheoreticalexpectationsthatwederivefromtheliterature.The‘ResearchDesign’sectionintroducestheresearchdesignincludingcaseselection,datagenerationandmethodologybeforewepresenttheanalysisandresultsinthe‘Results’section.Implicationsandlimitationsofthearticlearediscussedinthefinalsectionofthearticle,payingspecialattentiontohowwedealwithissuesofendogeneityandreversedcausality.
Crises,PerformanceandPoliticalTrustattheLocalLevel
Politicaltrust,broadlydefinedas‘a(chǎn)basicevaluativeorientationtowardthegovernment’(Hetherington,1998:791),iscrucialfordemocraciesinsofarasitaffectsseveralimpor-tantaspectssuchasparticipation,complianceandcooperation(LeviandStoker,2000).Accordingly,itisnotsurprisingthatalargestrandofresearchhasbeenhistoricallydevotedtounderstandingpolitical(dis)trust(see,forexample,CitrinandStoker,2018;ZmerliandvanderMeer,2017).
Researchontheeffectsofnaturaldisastershasprovidedrelevantinsightsintotheperformance–trustrelationshipbysuggestingthatextremeeventscanaltertrustlevelsbothpositivelyandnegatively.HurricaneKatrinain2005intheUnitedStateswasfound
Fiedleretal.3
tohavehadnegativeeffectsontrustinthegovernment(NichollsandPicou,2013),asdidthe2011earthquakeandtsunamiinJapan(UslanerandYamamura,2016),andthe2010Pakistanfloods(AkbarandAldrich,2015).Othershaveidentifieddisasterstoincreasepoliticaltrustatthenationallevel,including,forexample,anearthquakeinChinain2008(Hanetal.,2011),aswellaswildfiresinRussia(Lazarevetal.,2014).Similarly,severalstudiesshowthatgovernments’handlingofnaturaldisasterscanimpactvotingbehaviour(BechtelandHainmueller,2011;HealyandMalhotra,2009),andCarlinetal.(2014)foundthattheChileanearthquakesignificantlyimpactedpublicopiniontowardsdemoc-racy.Thissuggeststhathowgovernmentshandleextremeeventsmightbeimportanttoexplainpoliticaltrust.
TheCOVID-19pandemicprovidesanexceptionalpossibilitytofurtherstudythedynamicssurroundinghowanextremeevent,inthiscase,amajorhealthcrisis,affectspoliticaltrust.Twomajorstrandsofresearchhavedevelopedsofaronpoliticaltrustinthecontextofthepandemic(Devineetal.,2021).Thefirstlooksathowtrustinfluencescompliancewithdiseasecontrolmeasuresandsuggeststhattrustinthenationalgovern-mentisimportanttoexplaincitizens’acceptanceofandcompliancewithsuggestedmeas-ures(see,forexample,BargainandUlugbek,2020;Guglielmietal.,2020;Hanetal.,2021;J?rgensen,2021;Raudeetal.,2020aswellasarecentreviewofthisliteraturebyDevineetal.,2023).Thesecondlooksattheeffectoftheimplementationofmeasuresagainstthepandemic(especiallysocialdistancingandlockdowns)ontrust,andithasprovidedquitesomecomparativeevidencesuggestingthatlevelsofpoliticaltrustincreasedatthebeginningofthepandemicinseveralEuropeancountries(see,forexam-ple,Baekgaardetal.,2020;BelchiorandTeixeira,2021;Boletal.,2020;Esaiassonetal.,2020;Kestil?-Kekkonenetal.,2022;Kritzingeretal.,2021;Schraff,2020;Sibleyetal.,2020;vanderMeeretal.,2023).Whilesomeinterpretthisasacognitiveresponseofindividualspositivelyassessingtheperformanceoftheirgovernments(Esaiassonetal.,2020),othershaveinterpreteditasanemotionalresponsetriggeredbyanxietyanduncer-taintyintimesofcrisis,theso-called‘rallyaroundtheflag’effect(Schraff,2020).Atthesametime,firstcross-countrycomparisonsandlongitudinalanalysessuggestthatthiseffectmaywanerelativelyquicklyovertimeorevenbenegativeforthosehavingsuf-feredpsychologicaldistressduetothepandemic(Daviesetal.,2021;Kim,2022;Satherleyetal.,2022).
IncontrasttopreviousresearchonCOVID-19,whichalmostexclusivelyaimstoexplainchangesintrusttowardsnational-levelgovernment,weareinterestedintheeffectsofthepandemicatthelocallevel.Inmanyfederalsystems,thelocalgovernmentallevelhadwide-rangingcompetenciesinthehandlingofthepandemic(DuttaandFischer,2020;HirschfeldandThielsch,2022).Nevertheless,thelocallevelhasnotreceivedmuchattentionsofar.Wewereonlyabletoidentifytwostudiesthatexplicitlyaimtoexplaintrustinlocalinstitutionsamidthepandemic.First,Suetal.(2021)studiedperceptionstowardsthelocalgovernmentinChinaduringthebeginningofthepandemic.Basedonanonlinesurveywith1692participants,theyfoundperceivedpreparednesstobeassoci-atedwithrespondentsevaluatingthe‘performanceoflocalauthoritiesindealingwiththeCOVID-19’astrustworthy.However,thestudyalsoleavesimportantquestionsopenandyettobeaddressedbyfutureresearch–includinglonger-termeffects,directlystudyingpoliticaltrustanddoingsoinadecentralized,non-authoritariancontext.Second,HirschfeldandThielsch(2022)analysedtheeffectsofdifferentstrategiesofcrisiscom-munication,basedonanonlinesurveyexperimentwithmanipulatednewspaperarticlesthatwerepresentedto561Germanparticipants.Theydidnotfinddifferent
4PoliticalStudiesReview00(
0)
communicationstrategiestoaffectwhetherrespondentsacceptedsuggestedbehaviouralmeasures,buttheydidaltertrustinlocalpoliticians–inparticulardenyingthepandemichadunfavourableconsequences.Whiletheirfindingssuggestthathowlocalpoliticianshandlethepandemicimpactsoncitizens’trusttowardsthem,theirstudywasbuiltonfictionalscenarios(includingthemayorsinvolved)andfocusedontheeffectofdifferentcommunicationstrategiesratherthanperformance.Furthermore,whilethetwostudiesholdinterestinginsights,bothwerebasedonvoluntaryonlinesurveysandneitherdirectlyaddressedthequestionofhowlocalgovernments’handlingofthepandemicimpactedontrust.Insum,weconductthetoourknowledgefirstanalysisofhowlocalgovernments’handlingofthepandemicimpactedoncitizens’trusttowardsthem.
Thefactthatinseveralcountrieslevelsoftrustreportedtowardsthelocallevelaresignificantlyhigherthanthosetowardsthenationallevelsuggeststhatthereareimportantdifferencesbetweenthetwo(Mu?oz,2017).AndFitzgeraldandWolak(2016)suggestthatthereareimportantdifferencesinwhatdrivestrustatdifferentlevelsofgovernment.However,researchonpoliticaltrusthasonlyrecentlybeguntotakeacloserlookatthelocallevel(FitzgeraldandWolak,2016;Proszowskaetal.,2021;SteenvoordenandvanderMeer,2021).Crucially,animportantdifferencebetweenthetwolevelsofgovernmentisthatthelocallevelregardsmuchsmallerpoliticalunits,whichareperceivedasconsid-erablycloserbyconstituents(Mu?oz,2017).Thus,wethinktherelationshipbetweenperformanceandtrustmaydifferbetweenthelocalandnationallevelsandwillbepar-ticularlystrongatthelocallevelbecausethelinkbetweencitizensandtheirgovernmentismoredirect–thereisahigherlikelihoodthatcitizensknowtheirelectedrepresenta-tivespersonally,thatcitizensaremoreawareoflocalgovernments’activitiesandhencebetterabletoevaluatetheirperformance.Indeed,existingresearchindicatesthatpeoplecandifferentiatebetweengovernmentlevelswhenassessingtrust(FitzgeraldandWolak,2016)andthattheytransfertheirtrustassessmentsfromthoseinstitutionstheyknowbet-tertomaketrustjudgementsonthoseentitiestheyhavelessknowledgeabout(Theiss-MorseandBarton,2017).Inthisregard,differentstudiessuggestthattrusttowardslocalinstitutionsmaybemoreinfluentialfortrusttowardsnationalinstitutionsthanviceversa,contrarytoperceptionsofthelocallevelassecondorder(Proszowskaetal.,2021;vanAsscheandDierickx,2007).
Thecausalchainsupportingtheassumptionthatthecognitiveassessmentoftheper-formanceofpoliticalinstitutionsinformstrustisbasedonaseriesofconsecutivesteps.First,politicaltrustisatleastinpartrational,totheextenttowhichitisdeterminedbyanevaluationofthegovernment’sperformance(Hardin,1999).Second,individualshavetobeawareofthemeasuresimplementedbygovernments(Hardin,1999).Third,themeas-ureshavetobeconsideredimportantenoughsothattheyaffecttheevaluationofgovern-ments’performance(VanErkelandVanDerMeer,2016).
WebelievethecontexttriggeredbytheCOVID-19pandemicbenefitstheoddsthatindividualsevaluatetheactualperformanceofthegovernment.Weexpectevaluationsofgovernmentmeasurestobeparticularlyrelevantinthiscontextbecausetheloomingthreatofthepandemicrenderedmeasuresimplementedbygovernmentsofthehighestimportanceandultimatelypeople’slivesdependedonthem.Thesuspensionsofpoliticalandcivilrightsfurthermoredirectlyinterferedwithandaffectedpeople’severydaylivessubstantially(Doddsetal.,2020).Furthermore,wecanassumeastrongawarenessaboutgovernmentmeasuresas,amongothers,theconsumptionofpoliticalnewsincreasedinthisperiod(Casero-Ripolles,2020).Whilewecertainlydonotclaimallindividualsweremoreinformedaboutpoliticsorthatallinformationreceivedreflectedgovernments’
Fiedleretal.5
responseinareliablemanner,thesituationdescribedislikelytofavourthatevaluationsofperformancecontributetoexplaininglevelsofpoliticaltrust.Infact,literatureindi-catesthatcrisismanagementisimportanttoexplainlevelsofpoliticaltrust,alsoamidtheCOVID-19crisis,andvariablessuchasthequalityofinformationprovided,thestrengthoftheresponseandtheperceptionoftheusefulnessofmeasureshavebeenfoundtopre-dicthigherlevelsofpoliticaltrustamidthepandemic(see,forexample,CrepazandArikan,2021;Mansoor,2021;OudeGroenigeretal.,2021).Overall,thesefactorsrenderthepandemicanidealshowcasetostudytherelationshipbetweenperformanceandtrustinaclearlydelineateddomainofhighrelevancetopeople’severydaylives.
Thus,buildingontheideathatmultilevelpoliticalsystemsallowfortheexistenceofdistinctresponsestopoliticalchallenges(RozellandWilcox,2020),andconsideringlit-eraturethatsupportsthatindividualsareabletoisolatelevelsofgovernmentandassesstheirperformanceseparately(Proszowskaetal.,2021;SteenvoordenandvanderMeer,2021),weexpectthat:
H1.Individualswhoaremoresatisfiedwithlocalgovernment’sresponsetotheCOVID-19crisiswilldisplayhigherlevelsofpoliticaltrustintolocalinstitutions.
ResearchDesign
CaseSelection:Nepal
NepalconstitutesaninterestingcaseforourresearchontheeffectofsatisfactionwiththeCOVID-19responseonpoliticaltrustforthreemainreasons.
First,Nepalisstillarelativelynewdemocracy,havingexperienceda(second)demo-craticopeningonlyrecently,attheendofitscivilwarin2006.Eversince,Nepalhasbeenstrugglingwithestablishingwell-functioninginstitutionsandpoliticalstability.Politicalcrisesrecurringlytakeplaceatthenationallevel.Thismakesitparticularlyrelevanttoinvestigatehowtrustcanbestrengthenedinsuchanemergingdemocracywheretypically‘legalandpoliticalinstitutionsremainunder-developed,andthequalityofdemocraticgovernanceisstillprecarious’(KatzandLevin,2018:69).Researchfromotherworldregions,forexample,suggeststhatpoliticaltrustislowerandmorevolatileinnewerdemocracies(Marien,2011),andthattheremightbedifferencesregardingwhichfactorsaffectpoliticaltrust(CatterbergandMoreno,2005).
Second,thenewconstitutionofNepal,adoptedin2015,introducedfederalismandlocalelections,strengtheningthelocalgovernmentunits(LGUs)(GovernmentofNepal,2015).Thisinstitutionaldesignallowsustoexploitvariationsingovernmentperfor-manceatthesubnationallevel.LGUsarethelowestofthreegovernmentunitsinNepal–belowthefederalgovernmentsandsevenprovinces–andcomprise753urbanandruralmunicipalities.Theyarefurtherdividedintowards,whicharethesmallestadministrativeunitsinNepal(GovernmentofNepal,2015).Thelocalgovernmentsaredirectlyelectedandresponsibleforbasichealthandsanitationaswellasdisastermanagement,with‘theauthoritytodirectresourcestocounteractimminentthreatsagainstthehealthoftheirinhabitants’(AdhikariandBudhathoki,2020:961).Moreover,duringthepandemic,thecentralgovernmentaskedtheLGUstopreparequarantineandisolationfacilities,whichwerequicklysetup(Thapa,2021).Localgovernmentsalsodisseminatedinformationonthevirus,oversawtesting,recordingandlockdownprovisionsandprovidedfoodreliefamongotheractivities(Bhandarietal.,2020;Thapa,2021).Overall,theLGUshence
6PoliticalStudiesReview00(
0)
Table1.SelectionCriteriaforSampling.
Provinces
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Compositionofethnicidentities
A
D
B
B
A
C
C
OpenborderwithIndia
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Populationdensity
Medium
High
High
Low
Medium
Low
Low
Highlyaffectedbycivilwar
x
x
x
x
Remoteness
x
x
x
Region
Mountain/hill/terai
Terai
Mountain/hill
Mountain/hill
Terai/
hill
Mountain/hill
Terai/
hill
Source:Owncompilation.
playedakeyroleduringtheCOVID-19pandemic,makingitworthwhiletoinvestigatewhethertheirperformanceaffectedcitizens’trustinthem.Moreover,thefactthatthelocalgovernmentshaveonlybeenrecentlyestablishedreducestheriskthatpreconcep-tionsinfluencetrustlevels,therebyincreasingtheplausibilityofourassumedrelation-ship,namelythatsatisfactionwithperformanceinfluencestrust,insteadofpreconceivedinstitutiontrustlevelsdrivingperceptionsofperformance.
Finally,Nepalwasstronglyaffectedbythepandemic.WhiletheCOVID-19pandemicwasinitiallycontainedinNepal,partiallyduetothestrictnationwidelockdownimposedfrom24Marchto21July2020(Lamichhaneetal.,2022),itsliftingaswellasborderopenings–inparticulartohighlyaffectedIndia–ledtoincreasingnumbers.Especiallyinmid-April2021,theinfectionnumbersstarklyincreased,mostdramaticallyinthemetro-politanareaofKathmandu,sothat,byAugust2021,Nepalhadbecomeoneofthemostaffecteddevelopingcountriesworldwide(Lamichhaneetal.,2022).Weexpectthissitu-ationwillincreasetherelevanceofthehealthcrisisamongthepopulation,thusfacilitat-ingtheperformance-trustlinkdetailedinthesectionabove.
Data
Westudytheeffectsofthelocalgovernments’COVIDresponsebasedonalarge-Nsurveyconsistingof1400telephoneinterviews,1conductedbetween25Apriland24May2021(duringthesecondwaveofthepandemic).ThetargetgroupofNepaleseadultswasselectedinathree-stepsamplingstrategy.First,wepurposivelyselectedfouroutofthesevenNepaleseprovinces,toincludeareasthatare(A)moreandlesslikelytobeaffectedbythepandemicbasedonpopulationdensityaswellastheirprox-imitywithIndia(whichwasdeeplyaffectedbythepandemicatthemoment),(B)moreandlessremote,(C)populatedbydifferentidentitygroups2aswellas(D)markedbydifferentlevelsofviolenceduringthecivilwar.3Combiningthesecriterialedustoselectprovinces2,3,5and6(seeTable1).
Second,withinthefourprovinces,werandomlyselected68LGUs.Becausetheprov-incesdifferconsiderablyregardingthenumberandtypesofLGUs,wefirstallocatedLGUsproportionallytothenumberofLGUsperprovince(about17%ofthenumberofLGUsin1province).WethenselecteddifferenttypesofLGUs(rural,urbanandmajor
Fiedleretal.7
cities)proportionallytotheshareofthepopulationlivingindifferenttypesofLGUs.Duetoitslargepopulation,Kathmanduwasselectedthreetimes.Finally,withineachLGU,4wardswererandomlychosen(inKathmandu12wereselectedtoaccountforitsdemo-graphicweightinthecountry).
Inthelaststep,randomwalkswereusedtoidentifyhouseholdsandindividualrespond-entsusingthe‘lastbirthday’method.Respondentswereaskedtoprovidephonenumbersforconductingtheinterviewsatalaterstage.BecausesomemountainousareasofNepalareverydifficulttoreachandstrugglewithphoneconnectivity,alimitednumberofLGUsneededtobeexcludedbeforetherandomselection.4Sinceonly7%ofNepal’spopulationlivesinthemountainregion,weconsiderthisjustifiable.
Thesurveyisrepresentativeattheprovinciallevelregardinggender,age,urban/ruralmunicipalitiesandethnicidentitybasedonthe2011nationalpopulationcensus(NepalGovernment,2012).ThehighpenetrationofmobilephonesinNepal(onaverage1.3perperson)allowstoreachmostofthepopulationviaphone(see.np/en/mis-reports/#).QuestionswereaskedinNepali,andinMaithili,whichisthesecondmostwidelyspokenlanguageinNepalandparticularlyprominentintheTerairegioninwhichtwoofourfourselectedprovincesarelocated.
Itisimportanttonotethatsincethephonesurveywasconductedduringthepandemic,ethicalimplicationswerecarefullyconsidered.First,topreventcontributingtothespreadofCOVID-19,interviewswereconductedviatelephoneinsteadofface-to-face.Second,thecollectionofthephonenumbersthroughalistingexercisetookplaceinMarchatatimewheninfectionrateswereverylowandonlyrequiredaveryshortface-to-faceinter-action.Moreover,thesurveyfirmensuredstricthealthmeasurestoprotectinterviewersandrespondentsduringthelistingexercise.Third,pressuretoparticipatewasminimizedbyrestatingatthestartofeachinterviewthatparticipationinthesurveywasvoluntaryandparticipantscouldquitatanytime.Finally,respondentsreceivednoincentivesforparticipation.
Tocapturetrustatthelocallevel(dependentvariable),weusedtheaverageofthreequestionsaskingrespondentsabouttheirtrustlevelsintheward,mayoranddeputymayor(Cronbach’salpha=0.85).Tomeasureourkeyindependentvariable,theperceptionofCOVIDresponse,weusedthefollowingquestion:HowsatisfiedareyouwithhowtheelectedofficialsinthecurrentlocalgovernmenthandledtheCOVID-19pandemicinthepastyear?(Responsesrangingbetween1,verymuch,and4,notmuch;thescalewasinvertedsothathighervaluesrepresenthigherlevelsofsatisfaction).Overall,satisfactionisatamedium-lowlevel,with22%indicatingveryhigh,17%high,45%lowand17%verylowsatisfaction.Thequestiononsatisfactionwiththehandlingofthecrisiswasaskedfirstinthesurvey(thoughnotimmediatelybeforethequestionregardingtrust).Giventheliteratureonquestion-ordereffects,thisshouldincreasethechancesthatper-formanceperceptionsdidinfluenceanswersontrustlevels(SchumanandPresser,1996).5
Wealsoincludeddifferentcontrolsintheanalysistomakesurereportedcoefficientsarenotstatisticalartefactsduetoomittedvariablebias.6Wecontrolledforself-reported‘Interestinpolitics’(measuredona4-pointLikert-typescalefromlowtohigh)andper-ceptionofcorruptionusingaquestionthatasksrespondentstocomparecorruptionunderthecurrentandprevious(appointed)government(1ifrespondentsconsideredcorruptiontohavestayedthesameorbeinghigherthanbeforeand0otherwise).Wealsocontrolledfortrusttowardsnationalgovernment(from1,fully,to4,notatall;scaleinvertedintheanalysissothathighervaluesrepresenthigherlevelsoftrust),socialtrust(Generallyspeaking,wouldyousaythatmostpeoplecanbetrusted?Responsesranging
8PoliticalStudiesReview00(
0)
from1,trustfully,to4,cannotbetoocareful;scaleinvertedintheanalysis)andincum-bentvoteinthepastlocalelections(identifyingthosewhovotedforthepartyofthemajorineachLGUincludedintheanalysis).Finally,weincludedcontrolsforgender,age,education,ethnicity,rural/urbanlivingareaandpossessionofasmartphone(Theiss-MorseandBarton,2017).
AttheLGUlevel,wecontrolledforethnicfractionalisation,since,similarlytoethnic-ity,thedegreeofethnicfractionalisationmightalsodeterminewhetherpoliciesandinsti-tutionsareperceivedasexclusionaryandhencelessresponsive.Wemeasureethnicfractionalisationbasedonthelatestcensus(2011),usingtheethnicfractionalizationindexsuggestedbyAlesinaetal.(2003).Wealsocontrolledforpotentialeffectsassoci-atedwiththelegaciesofviolencebyusingdataoncasualtiesduringtheC
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫(kù)網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 房屋租賃經(jīng)營(yíng)書店協(xié)議書二零二五年
- 足球教練聘用合同二零二五年
- 二零二五版押車借款合同樣板
- 大班安全教育:特殊電話號(hào)碼
- 大學(xué)生創(chuàng)新創(chuàng)業(yè)工作介紹
- 2025紡織品購(gòu)銷合同書格式
- 人工智能和未來(lái)的教育
- 2025年智能家居設(shè)備技術(shù)合同書
- 2025年上海建筑勞動(dòng)合同范文新版(合同樣本)
- 中學(xué)敘事作文課件
- 電泳常見(jiàn)問(wèn)題及解決方法
- 小班語(yǔ)言活動(dòng)布谷鳥(niǎo)(早期閱讀)
- 第3章第四紀(jì)氣候變化和海平面變化課件
- 常州地質(zhì)勘察報(bào)告正文
- 多媒體技術(shù)ppt課件(完整版)
- 國(guó)家網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全檢查操作指南
- 精神科出科考試試題及答案
- DB44∕T 336-2006 鋸緣青蟹養(yǎng)殖技術(shù)規(guī)范 人工繁殖技術(shù)
- DB13(J) 185-2020 居住建筑節(jié)能設(shè)計(jì)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)(節(jié)能75%)(2021年版)
- 房屋建筑和市政基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施項(xiàng)目基本情況承諾(樣表)
- 《2022年上海市初中語(yǔ)文課程終結(jié)性評(píng)價(jià)指南》中規(guī)定的150個(gè)文言實(shí)詞
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論