研究方法與論文寫(xiě)作

--#-研究方法與論文寫(xiě)作蘇讓Thursdayl:40pm-3:30pmEmail:.edu.twPhone:x3316,x3292。教學(xué)目標(biāo)。瞭解圖書(shū)資訊學(xué)研究的概況與發(fā)展方向。熟悉各種研究方法與資料蒐集技巧。培養(yǎng)研究規(guī)劃、設(shè)計(jì)與評(píng)鑑的能力。瞭解學(xué)術(shù)寫(xiě)作格式與規(guī)範(fàn)0課程綱要?？茖W(xué)研究的意義與特質(zhì)。研究的設(shè)計(jì)與實(shí)施。研究方法的特性與應(yīng)用。學(xué)術(shù)論文的撰寫(xiě)與評(píng)鑑°教科書(shū)Powell,RonaldR.BasicResearchMethodsforLibrarians.Norwood,NJ:Ablex,1997.Busha,CharlesH.andHarter,StephenP.ResearchMethodsinLibrarianship:TechniquesandInterpretation,NewYork:AcademicPress,1980.°建議閱讀書(shū)目Babbie,EarlR.ThePracticeofSocialResearch.10thedition.Belmont,CA:WadsworthPublishing,2004.Frankfort-Nachmias,Chava.ResearchMethodsintheSocialSciences.6thed.,NewYork:WorthPublishers,2000.Lofland,JohnandLofland,LynH.AnalyzingSocialSettings:AGuidetoQualitativeObservationandAnalysis.3rdedition,Belmont,CA:WadsworthPublishing,1995.Mertens,DonnaM.ResearchMethodsinEducationandPsychology:IntegratingDiversitywithQualitativeandQuantitativeApproaches.ThousandOaks,CA:Sage,1998.Nachmias,DavidandNachmias,Chava.ResearchMethodsintheSocialSciences.NewYork:St.Martin'sPress,1987.Simon,JulianL.andBurstein,Paul.BasicResearchMethodsinSocialScience.3rdedition,NewYork:RandomHouse,1985.Wiersma,William.ResearchMethodsinEducation:AnIntro.dBucotstioonn:AllynandBacon,2000.Babbie,EarlR.李美華等譯。社會(huì)科學(xué)研究方法。臺(tái)北市：時(shí)英，民87年。王文科。教育研究法-教育研究的理論與實(shí)務(wù)。臺(tái)北市：五南，民90年。吳明清。教育研究：基本觀念方法之分析。臺(tái)北市：五南，民80年。楊國(guó)樞等合編。社會(huì)及行為科學(xué)研究法。臺(tái)北市：東華，民82年。張邵勳。研究方法。第三版，臺(tái)中市：滄海，民90年。周文欽。研究方法：實(shí)徵性研究取向。臺(tái)北市：心理，民91年。Wimmer,RogerandDominick,Joseph.李天任、藍(lán)莘等譯。大眾媒體研究。臺(tái)北市：亞太，民84年。Powell,RonaldR.“RecentTrendsinResearch:AMethodologiLibraEysay.”andInformationScienceResearch21(1)(1999):91-119日期課程內(nèi)容備註09/21課程簡(jiǎn)介；圖書(shū)資訊學(xué)研究概況09/28教師節(jié)10/05研究的基本觀念PowellChapter1,210/12研究計(jì)劃的設(shè)計(jì)；資料蒐集的技巧PowellChapter210/19抽樣法(Sampling)PowellChapter310/26問(wèn)卷調(diào)查法(QuestionnaireSurvey)分組報(bào)告開(kāi)始11/02訪問(wèn)調(diào)查法(InterviewSurvey)11/09觀察法(Observation)11/16期中考週11/23歷史研究法(Historical)11/30內(nèi)容分析法(ContentAnalysis)12/07疊慧法(Delphi)12/14實(shí)驗(yàn)法(Experimental)12/21引文分析法(CitationAnalysis)12/28質(zhì)化研究(QualitativeResearch)

01/04其他研究方法01/11資料分析與解釋01/18學(xué)期考試研究方法與論文寫(xiě)作學(xué)期報(bào)告※請(qǐng)參考圖書(shū)資訊學(xué)與其他相關(guān)學(xué)科之中英文文獻(xiàn)，回答以下問(wèn)題，並請(qǐng)?jiān)]明參考資料出處。電子問(wèn)卷調(diào)查的優(yōu)缺點(diǎn)為何？試述異動(dòng)紀(jì)錄分析法(Webloganalysis)的特性與應(yīng)用。試述焦點(diǎn)團(tuán)體訪談法(Focusgroupinterview)的進(jìn)行步驟。試舉出作業(yè)研究(operationsresearch)在圖書(shū)資訊學(xué)研究的相關(guān)應(yīng)用。何謂文獻(xiàn)老化現(xiàn)象？請(qǐng)找出人種誌研究法(Ethnography)在圖書(shū)資訊學(xué)的應(yīng)用試舉一篇文章來(lái)加以說(shuō)明之。理論(Theory)在圖書(shū)資訊學(xué)研究中的重要性為何？何謂典範(fàn)與典範(fàn)變遷(paradigmshift)？何謂分層隨機(jī)抽樣法？何謂配額抽樣？請(qǐng)說(shuō)明準(zhǔn)實(shí)驗(yàn)研究法的施行程序。注意事項(xiàng)：每位同學(xué)交一份書(shū)面報(bào)告，報(bào)告請(qǐng)於1/14/06中午以前繳交。研究方法評(píng)論報(bào)告一、內(nèi)容選擇一種研究方法，參考圖書(shū)館學(xué)或非圖書(shū)館學(xué)的中文及英文文獻(xiàn)（書(shū)、期刊文章、學(xué)位論文等）撰寫(xiě)一篇報(bào)告介紹此種研究方法。報(bào)告的內(nèi)容項(xiàng)目如下：定義、起源、目的特性、進(jìn)行的程序7.優(yōu)、缺點(diǎn)（應(yīng)注意事項(xiàng)）應(yīng)用（此部分首先列舉出兩篇應(yīng)用此研究方法完成的圖書(shū)資訊學(xué)文獻(xiàn)書(shū)目，中英文各一篇，並作內(nèi)容之摘要與讀後感）註釋或參考書(shū)目二、書(shū)面報(bào)告每一組選一個(gè)研究法，一至二人一組，在口頭報(bào)告當(dāng)天，共同交一份書(shū)面報(bào)告。報(bào)告必須用電腦打字印在A4紙張上，且力求清晰易讀，封面頁(yè)應(yīng)打上題目與組員姓名。三、口頭報(bào)告每一組在口頭報(bào)告前，須將書(shū)面報(bào)告影印本分發(fā)給老師及班上其他同學(xué)。一次安排一組，每組報(bào)告時(shí)間以35-45分鐘為原則。報(bào)告時(shí)請(qǐng)配合投影片的播放?？陬^報(bào)告後可繼續(xù)修正初稿，並於一週之後將書(shū)面報(bào)告交給老師。研究方法評(píng)論報(bào)告[10/26]簽名問(wèn)卷調(diào)查法(MailQuestionnaireSurvey)訪問(wèn)調(diào)查法(InterviewSurvey)[11/2]觀察法(ObservationMethod)個(gè)案研究法(CaseStudy)[11/9]歷史研究法(HistoricalMethod)實(shí)驗(yàn)研究法(ExperimentalMethod)[11/16]引文分析法(CitationAnalysis)內(nèi)容分析法(ContentAnalysis)[11/23]疊慧法(Delphi)質(zhì)化研究法(QualitativeResearch)研究方法報(bào)告日期題目組員名單

10/18問(wèn)卷調(diào)查法(MailQuestionnaireSurvey)10/25訪問(wèn)調(diào)查法(InterviewSurvey)11/01觀察法(Observation)11/08個(gè)案研究法(CaseStudy)11/15歷史研究法(HistoricalResearch)11/22內(nèi)容分析法(ContentAnalysis)11/29實(shí)驗(yàn)法(ExperimentalResearch)12/13疊慧法(DelphiMethod)12/20引文分析法(CitationAnalysis)12/27質(zhì)化研究(QualitativeResearch)研究方法與論文寫(xiě)作研究方法與論文寫(xiě)作表單的頂端表單的底部ProblemStatementsKeycomponentofaproposal-forresearchorfor$$$fundingSampleargumentscanoftenbefoundinthe?Introduction?ofaresearcharticleMakingthecasethataparticularquestionis(orwasworthspendingtimeandmoneyonHelpstoanswerthe?sowhat??/the?whocares??questionsFocusofaProblemStatementSome?need?mustbeaddressed??Some?problem?mustbetackledDramaticstartisoftenhelpful,forfundedeffortsparticularlyAvoidCircularReasoningAvoidsayingthattheproblemorneedisthelackofthethingyouaresuggesting.For?example:oTheprobleminthiscommunityisthatithasnolibrary.oLeadsto:TheneedisforalibraryTheobjectiveistocreatealibraryThemethodisaplanforbuildingalibraryEvaluationconsistsof?istherealibraryornot??BettertohavesomeevidenceoftheneedWhatproportionofthecommunityhas?latchkeychildren?problems?Whatproportionofthecommunityneedliteracyprograms?Whatotherlibraryprogramscouldhelpwithcommunityproblems?Whatdo?powerelite?inthecommunitysay?BuildingtheProblemStatementSketchtheproblemthatyoufeelexistsoWhoelsesaysitisaproblem?oAnystatistics/commentarythathighlighttheproblem?oWhatothereffortshavebeenmadetoworkontheproblem?oCreateageneralquestionyouwouldlikeyourstudy(whenfinished)toanswer.?Giventhatquestion,suggestanapproachthatwillprovideananswer.oWhatsortofsamplewouldyouneedtouse?oWhatsortofvariablescouldyoucollectdataconcerning?oWhatsortofmethodmightbeusedtocreateausefulsetofdata?oWhatsortofinherentbiasesmightexist?(useyourimagination,ifnoliteraturehelps)PreviousslideNextslideBacktofirstslideViewgraphicversionFullProposalUsuallyConsistsof?Introductiondescribingyour/theorganization?s?credibility?ProblemStatement?ObjectivesorResearchQuestionstobeaddressedMethodstobeemployedtoachieveobjectivesTimelineorchartindicatingphasesEvaluationplanfordeterminingthedegreeofachievementBroaderApplicationofOutcome/LookingdownthepathBudgetWhoEvaluatesYourProposal?MostfundingagenciesreallywantyoutobesuccessfuTheyhavecriteriabywhichyourproposalisscoredTheywillsharethesecriteriawithyouoften?Putyourselfinthe?shoes?ofyourevaluatoroHaveyoumadeiteasyforthemtoseeyourplannedapproach?oIsthereaclearstructuretoyourproposal?oIsthereaclearrelationshipbetweenthemoniesyourequireandwhatyouwillaccomplish?PreviousslideNextslideBacktofirstslideViewgraphicversionMostCommonReasonsforaFailedProposal?Your?credibility?tosuccessfullycarrythroughisunclearYourplanseemsoverlyoptimisticYourmethodseemsinappropriatetothetaskYour?need?hasalreadybeenaddressedintheworkoothersItisquitelikelythatyourorganizationwillcarrythroughtheeffortwhetheryougetfundedornotThomasKuhnhasdescribedscientific