員工滿意度中英文對照外文翻譯文獻_第1頁
員工滿意度中英文對照外文翻譯文獻_第2頁
員工滿意度中英文對照外文翻譯文獻_第3頁
員工滿意度中英文對照外文翻譯文獻_第4頁
員工滿意度中英文對照外文翻譯文獻_第5頁
已閱讀5頁,還剩19頁未讀, 繼續(xù)免費閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進行舉報或認領

文檔簡介

文獻信息:文獻標題:EmployeeSatisfaction:CommunicationCompetenceandLeadershipOrientedApproach(員工滿意度:溝通能力與領導導向)國外作者:IKSuher,CSBir,EEngin,BEAkgoz文獻出處:《International Journal of Innovative Research andDevelopment》,2016,5(5):194-202字數(shù)統(tǒng)計:英文3265單詞,19231字符;中文5450漢字外文文獻:EmployeeSatisfaction:CommunicationCompetenceandLeadershipOrientedApproachAbstractThisresearchexploreswhetherornotrelationshipsbetweensupervisorcommunicatorcompetences,leadershipstyle(Task-orientedvs.Relation-oriented)andemployeejobandcommunicationsatisfactionexist.Participantsare126graduatestudentswhoworksfor(52malesand74female)avarietyoforganizationsinTurkey.Thefindingssignifythatthereisincontrovertiblypositiveandstrongrelationshipbetweensupervisorcommunicationcompetenceandemployeecommunicationsatisfaction.Inasimilarway,relationalleadershipstylehasstrongeffectonemployeecommunicationsatisfaction.Ontheotherhand,theresultsindicatethatweakrelationshipbetweentask-orientedleadershipstyleandjobandcommunicationsatisfaction.Accordingtheresultscommunicatorcompetenceisthestrongestsignificantstandardizedregressioncoefficientwiththejobandcommunicationsatisfaction.Keywords:Employeecommunication,communicationcompetence,leadershipstyle1.IntroductionEmployeesatisfactioninfluenceanindividual'scommitmenttothecompanyandalsoithaseffectonemployeeperformanceandbusinesssuccess.Employeebehaviorandsatisfactionarehighlycorrelatedtotheorganizationsuccessandbecauseofthisreasontheresearchesonemployeesatisfactionisquiterich.Pincus(1986)investigatedtheeffectofcommunicationsatisfactiononjobperformance,Helm(2011)studiedaboutemployees’impactoncorporatereputation,CravensandOliver(2006)mentionedemployeesaskeyfactorofreputation,AntoncicandAntoncic(2011)andDuboffandHeaton(1999)specifiedhowemployeesatisfactionisimportantonbusinessgrowth,Bulgarella(2005),Hannaatall.(2004)remarkedthatemployeesatisfactionisavitalaspectforcustomersatisfaction,Brownetal.(1996)foundoutthatpositiveemployeebehaviorhasstrongandpositiveeffectoncustomersatisfaction.Kattaraetal.(2014)publishedastudyaboutimpactofemployeebehavioroncustomers'overallsatisfaction.Employeesatisfactioncontainsbothcommunicationandjobsatisfactionanditisinfluencedbymanydifferentfactorslikeleadershipstyleandthequalityofcommunicationwithleaders.Increasingtheeffectivenessofleader-employeecommunicationcanhelptostrengthenlevelsofemployeesatisfaction.2.LiteratureReview2.1.CommunicationCompetenceCommunicationcompetenceisabouttheknowledgeandwisdomofusingapplicablecommunicationskills.Communicationcompetenceisnotjustunderstandingpropercommunicationskillsbutalsotheabilitytoapplyandadaptthatknowledgewhencertainsituationsmayemergeunexpected(CooleyandRoacch,1984:25).Communicationcompetenceisconsideredtocontainbothcognitiveandbehavioralaspects(Rubin,1985).Understandingthatcommunicationcompetencecontainsthesetwoaspects,thenbeingsociallyinformedandperceptiveisakeyfactorinbeingacompetentcommunicator.Light(1989)consideredfundamentalconstructsofcommunicationcompetenceasfunctionalityofcommunication;sufficiencyofcommunication,knowledge,judgmentandskill.Spitzberg(1983)believedthatcommunicationcompetenceinvolvedknowledge,motivationandskillasasystemthatrelatesandconnectstooneanother.Inordertobemutuallybeneficenttooneanotherinarelationship,communicationcompetenceisanecessarytoolwhichconsistsofcognitive,attitudinal,emotionalandbehavioralknowledge(B-Ikeguchi,2014).Inordertoreachpersonal,educational,vocationalandsocialgoals,communicationcompetenceisakeyqualitythatanindividualneedinordertoattainsuccessinlife(LightandMcnughton,2014:1).2.2.LeadershipYukldefinedleadershipas“theprocessofinfluencingotherstounderstandandagreeaboutwhatneedstobedoneandhowtodoit,andtheprocessoffacilitatingindividualandcollectiveeffortstoaccomplishsharedobjectives”(2016:8).Leadershipisnotjustatrait,itisrecognizedasaprocesswhichindividualsinfluencepeopleinordertoreachcertaingoalsandobjectivesasaunit(Sharmai,Jain,2013).Bryman(1992)consideredleadershipastheabilitytodirectpeopletowardscertaingoalsforanorganization.Inliterature,leadershipisconsideredtobedividedintotwoseparatefunctions;Task-orientedleadershipandrelation-orientedleadership(Taberner,Chambel,Arana,2009).Task-orientedleadershipfocusesonorganizing,planningandcoordinatingthenecessaryjobsneededoftheteamorindividualemployeeswhereasrelation-orientedleadershipfocusesonthemotivationandbehaviorsofthepeoplethemselves.Inrelation-orientedleadership,theleaderworkstoinspirethosearoundhiminordertoachievetheorganization’ssuccess.Theeffectivenessofleader-subordinaterelationshipaffectsmanyorganizationoutcomesduetogroupsatisfaction(Anderson,Madlock&Hoffman,2006).Leadershipplaysagreatrollineffectingemployeesatisfaction(Castaneda&Nahavand,1991).2.3.CommunicationSatisfactionCommunicationsatisfactionisanimportanttopicinourdaywhichisbeingresearchedandinvestigatedforbusinessandcommunicationindustries.“Communicationsatisfactionisanemployee'ssatisfactionwithvariouscommunicationpracticesoftheorganization”(ClampittandGirard,1993:84).Pincusdescribedcommunicationsatisfactionastheaccumulationofanindividual’ssatisfactionwhichissaturatedfrominformationflowandrelationshipvariables(Pincus,1986).Differentresearcheshasstudiedoncommunicationsatisfactionmeasurement.Forinstance,DownsandHazen(1977)createdCommunicationSatisfactionQuestionnaire,OrganizationalCommunicationScalewasconductedbyRobertsandO’Reilly(1979),andtoanalyzecommunicationpracticesinorganizations.CrinoandWhite(1981)weretheresearcherswhoofferedaconceptualizationofcommunicationsatisfaction.AconceptualizationofcommunicationsatisfactionwasofferedbyCrinoandWhite(1981),whoarguedthatorganizationalcommunicationsatisfactioninvolvesanindividual’ssatisfactionwithvariousaspectsofthecommunicationoccurringintheorganization,whereasPutti,Aryee,andPhua(1990)demonstratedthatorganizationalmembers’communicationsatisfactionisassociatedwiththeamountofinformationavailabletothem.Althoughcommunicationprovidesemployeeswithinformationthatclarifiesworktasksandmaycontributetocommunicationsatisfaction,AndersonandMartin(1995)foundthatemployeesengageincommunicationinteractionswithcoworkersandsuperiorstosatisfyinterpersonalneedsofpleasureandinclusion.Thus,employeecommunicationsatisfactionappearstoinvolveataskandrelationaldimension.2.4.JobSatisfactionJobsatisfactionhasbeenanareawhichexaminedbyresearchersforalongtime.AccordingtoLocke(1976)definitionjobsatisfactionisapleasantorpositiveemotionalexpressionwhichcausesbyworker’sjoborjobexperience.Manydifferentresearcheshaveshownthatdissatisfiedemployeesaremorelikelytoquittheirjobsorbeabsentthansatisfiedemployeessojobsatisfactionisoneofthevitalnecessariesforbusinesssuccess(SaariandJudge,2004).AccordingtoSchneiderandSnyder’sdefinition(1975)jobsatisfactionispersonalevaluationofconditionsrelatedtojob,oroutcomesthatariseasaresultofhavingajob.Theperceptionofemployeesabouttheirjobisinfluencedbymanydifferentfactorssuchasemployee’spersonalcircumstanceslikeneeds,valuesandexpectations(Sempaneatal.2002).Moreover,qualityofcommunicationintheorganization,communicationbetweenemployeesandsupervisorsandsupervisorleadershipstylehaveaninfluenceontheemployees’jobsatisfaction.3.MethodThisresearchexploresifrelationshipsexistbetweensupervisorcommunicatorcompetence,leadershipstyle(taskorrelationshiporiented)anemployeejobandcommunicationsatisfactioninTurkey.ThecurrentresearchconductedbasedontheMudlock’sarticle(2008)thattitled“TheLinkBetweenLeadersh?pStyle,CommunicatorCompetenceandEmployeeSat?sfaction”TheresearchprocesswhichusedbyMudlock(2008)containedfourdifferentscalestoinvestigaterelationshipbetweencomponents.AuthorsreachedtheoriginalpublicationswhichcontainthescaleitemsandthesescalestranslatedtoTurkishbyauthorsandthepilotquestionnairewassend10participants.Theresultsofthispilotwereusedtorefinethequestionnairefordistributiontoresearchparticipants.ThedatausedinthisstudywerecollectedfromgraduatestudentsofBahcesehirUniversityinTurkey.Respondentswerechosenbyusingtheconveniencesamplingmethod.TheseparticipantsarenotonlygraduatestudentsofMarketingCommunicationandPublicRelationsprogrambutalsotheyworkfordifferentorganizations.Thesurveywaspre-testedon10studentsandthenatotalof200questionnaireformssendthemviae-mail.Attheendofthegivenperiod126usablequestionnaireformsreturned.CommunicatorcompetencescaledwasdevelopedbyMongeetal.(1982.9)whichis12-itemCommunicatorCompetenceQuestionnaire.Jobsatisfactionwasmeasuredbythe8-itemAbridgedJobinGeneral(AJIG)scale(Russelletal.,2004).Communicationsatisfactionwasmeasuredbythe19-itemInterpersonalCommunicationSatisfactionInventory(ICSI)developedbyHecht(1978).Leadershipstylewasmeasuredbythe20-itemLeadershipStyleQuestionnairedevelopedbyNorthouse(2001).Theinstrumentmeasuresthetaskandrelationalleadershipstyles.Mudlock(2008)usedPearsoncorrelationsandmultipleregressionanalysestoshowrelationshipbetweenpredictorandcriterionvariables.Inthecurrentresearchwefollowedhiswaytotesthypothesesandtoanswertwodifferentresearchquestions.ThecurrentresearchhasthesamehypothesesandresearchquestioninMudlock’s(2008)article.Theseare:H1:Thereisasignificantandpositiverelationshipbetweensupervisorcommunicationcompetenceandemployeejobandcommunicationsatisfaction.H2:Thereisasignificantandpositiverelationshipbetweensupervisorrelationalleadershipstyleandemployeejobandcommunicationsatisfaction.H3:Thereisasignificantandpositiverelationshipbetweenasupervisor’staskleadershipstyleandemployeejobandcommunicationsatisfaction.H4:Thereisasignificantandpositiverelationshipbetweenasupervisor’staskandrelationalleadershipstyleandcommunicationcompetence.RQ1:Whichbehaviordisplayedbyasupervisor—taskleadership,relationalleadership,orcommunicatorcompetence—willserveasagreaterpredictorofemployeecommunicationsatisfaction?RQ2:Whichbehaviordisplayedbyasupervisor—taskleadership,relationalleadership,orcommunicatorcompetence—willserveasagreaterpredictorofemployeejobsatisfaction?4.FindingsParticipantswere126workingadultsandmorethanhalfwerefemale(seetable1).Table3showsorganizationswhichtheyworkfor.43participantswereworkingforafemalesupervisorand79wereworkingforamalesupervisor.(seetable2)Participantsrangedinagefrom<=25to41+(M=30.44,SD=16),whereassupervisors’agesrangedfrom30to71(M=48,70SD=12.7).Table3containsinformationaboutparticipant’sorganizationstypes.f%Female7458,73Male5241,27Total126100Table1:SexofParticipantsf%Female4334,13Male7962,70NoAnswer43,17Total126100Table2:TheSexofSupervisorf%Hightech129,52Manufacturing32,38Service5342,06Education1915,08Civilservice1310,32Government21,59Other1814,29NoAnswer64,76Total126100Table3:OrganizationsofParticipantsTable4showsquestionnaireitemsandthemeanscoresofcommunicatorcompetence.Cronbach’salphaforthecurrentstudyis0.809andthedimensionmeanis3.13.Whencommunicatingwithmyimmediatesupervisor,Ifeel...MeanStd.Dev.DimensionMeanAlphaheorsheletsmeknowthatIamcommunicatingeffectively.3,741,0603,130,809nothingiseveraccomplished.2,261,156Iwouldliketocontinuehavingconversationslikeours3,061,233heorshegenuinelywantstogettoknowme3,551,066verydissatisfiedwithourconversations.2,321,164likeIhavesomethingelsetodo.2,981,160IamabletopresentmyselfasIwanthimorhertoviewme.2,541,311heorsheshowsmethatheorsheunderstandswhatIsay.3,631,094verysatisfiedwithourconversations.3,611,058heorsheexpressesalotofinterestinwhatIhavetosay.3,211,184IdoNOTenjoyourconversations2,281,093heorshedoesNOTprovidesupportforwhatheorshesays2,701,183thatIcantalkaboutanythingwithmyimmediatesupervisor3,361,221thatweeachgettosaywhatwewant.3,331,200thatwecanlaugheasilytogether.3,771,067conversationsflowsmoothly.3,711,065heorshechangesthetopicwhenhisorherfeelingsarebroughtintotheconversation.3,041,235heorshefrequentlysaidthingsthataddlittletotheconversation.3,441,077weoftentalkaboutthingsthatIamNOTinterestedin.2,841,162Table4:CommunicationSatisfactionTable5containsitemsandmeanscorerelatedtojobsatisfaction.Cronbach’salphaforthecurrentstudywas0.787(seetable5).MeanStd.Dev.DimensionMeanAlphaGood4,100,7853,340,787Undesirable2,361,049Betterthanmost3,681,027Disagreeable2,521,165Makesmecontent3,791,074Excellent3,141,309Enjoyable3,581,023Poor2,471,268Table5:JobSatisfactionCommunicationsatisfactionscaleitemsandthemeanscoresmaybeseeninthetable6.Cronbach’salphaforthecurrentstudyis0.800andthedimensionmeanis3.53.Myimmediatesupervisor...MeanStd.DevDimensionMeanAlphahasagoodcommandofthelanguage3,850,993issensitivetomyneedsofthemoment3,710,884typicallygetsrighttothepoint.3,751,050paysattentiontowhatIsaytohimorher.3,860,9013,530,800dealswithmeeffectively3,521,161isagoodlistener.3,711,144isdifficulttounderstandwhencommunicatinginwrittenform.2,441,281expresseshisorherideasclearly.4,060,888isdifficulttounderstandwhenheorshespeakstome.2,401,369generally,saystherightthingattherighttime.3,521,008iseasytotalkto.3,711,087usuallyrespondstomessages(memos,phonecalls,reports,etc.)quickly.3,781,123Table6:CommunicatorCompetenceLeadershipstylewasmeasuredbythe20-itemLeadershipStyleQuestionnaire.Originallythisscalehas20differentitemstoevaluateleadershipstyle.10of20itemsarerelatedtotask-orientedstylewhiletheothersarerelatedtorelationship-orientedstyle.Inthisresearchweusedonescaletomeasureleadershipstylebutbelowweusedtwodifferenttablestoshowtask-orientedandrelationship-orienteditems’meanscoresandCronbach’salpharesults.Myimmediatesupervisor...MeanStd.Dev.DimensionMeanAlphatellsgroupmemberswhattheyaresupposedtodo.3,940,8883,830,877setsstandardsofperformanceforgroupmembers.3,800,992respondsfavorablytosuggestionsmadebyothers.3,900,983makeshisorherperspectivecleartoothers.3,690,971developsaplanofactionforthegroup3,801,518behavesinapredictablemannertowardgroupmembers3,701,138definesroleresponsibilitiesforeachgroupmember.3,871,012clarifieshisorherownrolewithinthegroup.3,831,079providesaplanforhowtheworkistobedone3,931,044providescriteriaforwhatisexpectedofthegroup.3,871,015Table7:LeadershipStyle(Task)Myimmediatesupervisor...MeanStd.Dev.DimensionMeanAlphaactsfriendlywithmembersofthegroup.3,771,0443,750,932helpsothersfeelcomfortableinthegroup.3,731,061makessuggestionsonhowtosolveproblems3,900,995treatsothersfairly3,661,160communicatesactivelywithgroupmembers.3,941,018showsconcernforthepersonalwell-beingofothers3,771,194showsflexibilityinmakingdecisions3,711,081disclosesthoughtsandfeelingstogroupmembers3,551,001encouragesgroupmemberstodoqualitywork3,740,997helpsgroupmembersgetalong3,700,957Table8:LeadershipStyle(relationship)Thefirsthypothesiswastherewouldbesignificantandpositiverelationshipsbetweensupervisorcommunicationcompetenceandemployeejobandcommunicationsatisfaction.Pearsoncorrelationssupportedthehypothesisbyindicatingstatisticallysignificantpositiverelationshipsbetweenthepredictorandcriterionvariables.Therelationshipbetweencommunicationcompetenceandcommunicationsatisfactionwasstrongerthantherelationshipbetweencommunicationcompetenceandjobsatisfaction.ThesecondhypothesispredictedsignificantandpositiverelationshipsbetweensupervisorrelationalleadershipstyleandemployeejobandcommunicationsatisfactionPearsoncorrelationssupportedthehypothesis.Therelationshipbetweensupervisorrelationalleadershipstyleandemployeecommunicationsatisfactionwasstrongwhiletherelationshipbetweensupervisorrelationalleadershipstyleandemployeejobsatisfactionweak.Thethirdhypothesissuggestedsignificantandpositiverelationshipsbetweensupervisortaskleadershipstyleandemployeejobandcommunicationsatisfaction.Pearsoncorrelationssupportedthehypothesis.However,bothrelationshipswereweak.Thefourthhypothesiswastherewouldbesignificantandpositiverelationshipsbetweensupervisors’taskandrelationalleadershipstyleandtheircommunicatorcompetence.Pearsoncorrelationssupportedthehypothesis.Forbothcomponentstherelationshipswerestrong.5.DiscussionNowadays,themostimportantattributethatcorporationsmaypossessisregardedastheiremployees.Establishingeffectivecommunicationwiththeemployeesconsideredasanintegralpartoftheentirein-houseprocessandoperationdependsonthecommunicationcompetenceoftheleader.Whentheleaderestablishesefficientcommunicationbetweentheemployees,itwillbedeemedashavingtakenanimportantstepfordeterminingandeliminatingtheproblematicareasandproblemsencounteredbythecorporation.Thesatisfactionoftheemployeesabouttheirjobandcommunicationissignificantforfulfillingcorporateobjectives.Twoofthesebasicaspectswhichaffectthissatisfactionlevelaretheleadershipstyledemonstratedbytheexecutivesandcommunicationcomponent.Thecommunicationestablishedwiththeemployeeshasnumeroussignificantfunctions.Thesemaybelistedasacquiringinformation,persuasionandinfluence,providinginstructionsandcombinationwitheducation-training.Communicationcomponentpossessedbytheleaderhasakeyroleinfulfillingthesefunctionsinahealthymannerbecausethiscompetenceconstitutesoneofthemilestonesfortheformationofmutuallysatisfactoryrelationshipswiththeemployee.Apartfromthecommunicationcompetenceoftheexecutive,itisalsoindicatedthathisleadershipapproachaffectstheemployee'scommunicationandjobsatisfaction.Mudlock(2008)previouslyexaminedtherelationshipbetweencommunicationcompetence,leadershipstyleandemployeecommunicationandjobsatisfactioninaresearchthathehadconductedanddeterminedthatthereisastrongandpositivecorrelationbetweenthese.ThiscurrentresearchisalsoderivedfromMudlock’sstudyandteststhesamehypothesesinTurkeyobtainingsimilarresultsintheend.Accordingtotheseresults,therelationshipbetweencommunicationcompetenceandcommunicationsatisfactionisstrong.Thisstatisticallysignificantandpositiverelationshipdemonstratesthatitisofvitalimportanceforsupervisorstodeveloptheircommunicationcompetencesandtransformthesecompetencesintoanintegralpartoftheirleadershipstyles.Ithasbeenconcludedthatthesupervisorcommunicationcomponenthasapositiveimpactonthejobsatisfactionoftheemployeeseventhoughitisnotasstrongascommunicationsatisfaction.Employeecommunicationandjobsatisfactionbothhaveakeysignificanceintheperformanceofbothin-houseandoutsidetargetsofthecorporation,ensuringmarketgrowth,increasingcustomersatisfactionlevels,increasingsalesfiguresandcreatingastrongandpositivecorporatereputation.Forthisreasons,executivesarerequiredtoshowthenecessaryeffortstodeveloptheircommunicationcompetences.Itisobviousthatthecommunicationcompetenceisoneofthedeterminantfactorsontaskandrelationalorientedleadershipstyles.Inthisstudy,ithasbeenconcludedthattherelationshipbetweensupervisorrelationalleadershipstyleandemployeecommunicationsatisfactionwasstrong.Relationalleadershipstylereferstoplacingtherelationshipestablishedwithotherpeopletothecorewhileactingasaleaderandtherightmanagementofrelationships.Inthisregard,executivesconcentratingontheirrelationalleadershipskillswhiledevelopingtheircommunicationcomponentswouldbearpositiveresults.Task-orientedleadershipstyleplacesemphasesonobtainingsuitablebusinessmethodsandcarefulinspectionofgroupmembersforthesuccessofthebusiness.Thecommunicationchannelsusedbythecorporationbetweentheleaderandgroupmembersisonlyrelatedtotheactivationofthestructureandobtainingresults(Bloisitetal.,2003:574).Therefore,asatask-orientedleaderonlyevaluatesthetaskperformanceofitsemployees,itdoesnothaveadirectlystatisticallysignificantimpactonthejobandcommunicationsatisfactionoftheemployee.Asthesupervisorcannotestablisheffectivecommunicationtodevelopanykindofrelationship,itisnaturalfortherelationshipwiththecommunicationsatisfactionoftheemployeestoyieldweakresults.Inconclusion,thisresearchdemonstratesthattheleader'scommunicationcompetencesandatthesametime,relationalleadershipstylehaveapositiveimpacttoensureemployeesatisfactionandinthisregard,itprovidesaguidancetothecorporationswhichwouldliketoconcentrateonsatisfactionthattheyhavetodevelopthequalityofcommunicationandsupportrelationalleadershipapproach.中文譯文:員工滿意度:溝通能力與領導導向摘要12674關(guān)鍵詞:員工溝通,溝通能力,領導風格1.簡介員工滿意度影響個人對公司的承諾,也影響員工的績效和企業(yè)的成功。員工的行為和滿意度與組織的成功有著密切的關(guān)系,因此,對員工滿意度的研究也相當眾多。Pincus(1986)研究了溝通滿意度對工作績效的影響,Helm(2011)研究了員工對企業(yè)聲譽的影響,CravensOliver(2006)提到員工是聲譽的關(guān)鍵因素,AntoncicAntoncic(2011)Duboff、Hanna(2004)指出員工滿意度是客戶滿意度的一個重要方面,Brown(1996)發(fā)現(xiàn)積極的員工行為對客戶滿意度有強烈的正面影響。Kattara等人(2014)發(fā)表了一項關(guān)于員工行為對客戶整體滿意度影響的研究。員工滿意度既包含溝通滿意度,又包含工作滿意度,它受領導風格和領導溝通質(zhì)量等多種因素的影響。提高領導與員工溝通的有效性可以幫助提高員工滿意度。2.文獻綜述2.1.溝通能力確的溝通技巧,還包括在某些意外情況下應用和適應這種知識的能力Roacch,1984:25。溝通能力被認為包含認知和行為兩個方面(Rubin,1985。了解到溝通能力包含這兩方面的內(nèi)容,那么,具備社會知識和洞察力是成為一名稱職的溝通者的關(guān)鍵因素。Light(1989)認為,溝通能力的基本結(jié)構(gòu)是溝通的功能;溝通的充分性、知識、判斷力和技巧。Spitzberg(1983)認為,作為一個相互聯(lián)系、相互作用的系統(tǒng),溝通能力涉及它包括認知、態(tài)度、情感和行為知識(B-Ikeguchi,2014。為了達到個人、教育、職業(yè)和社會目標,溝通能力是個人獲得成功所需要的關(guān)鍵素質(zhì)(Light。2.2.領導力Yukl(2016:8種特質(zhì),它被公認為一個過程,個人影響眾人以達到作為一個整體的特定目標和目的(Sharmai,Jain,2013。Bryman(1992)認為領導力是指導人們實現(xiàn)組織某些目標的能力。在文獻中,領導力被分為兩個獨立的職能:任務型領導和關(guān)系型領導(Taberner,Chambel,Arana,2009和協(xié)調(diào)團隊或單個員工所需的必要工作,而以關(guān)系為導向的領導則關(guān)注員工自身的動機和行為。在以關(guān)系為導向的領導中,領導者努力激勵周圍的人,以取得組織的成功。領導—下屬關(guān)系的有效性由于集體滿意度而影響到許多組織結(jié)果(Anderson,MadlockHoffman,2006。領導在影響員工滿意度方面發(fā)揮了重要作用(CastanedaNahavand,1991。2.3.溝通滿意度(ClampittheGirard,1993:84Pincus。不同的研究對通信滿意度的測量進行了研究。例如,DownsHazen(1977)編制了溝通滿意度問卷,RobertsWhite(1981)是提出溝通滿意度概念的研究者。CrinoWhite(1981)Putti、AryeeAndersonMartin(1995)發(fā)現(xiàn),員工與同事及上級進行溝通交流是為了滿足人際關(guān)系中對快樂和包容需求。因此,員工溝通滿意度似乎涉及到任務和關(guān)系維度。2.4.工作滿意度工作滿意度一直是研究人員長期研究的領域。根據(jù)Locke(1976)的定義,工作滿意度是一種愉快的或積極的情緒表達,它是由工作者的工作或工作經(jīng)歷引起的。許多不同的研究表明,與滿意的員工相比,不滿意的員工更有可能辭職或缺勤,因此工作滿意度是企業(yè)成功的關(guān)鍵因素之一(SaariJudge,2004。SchneiderSnyder(1975)條件或工作產(chǎn)生的結(jié)果的評價。員工對工作的看法受到許多不同因素的影響,例如員工的個人情況,如需求、價值觀和期望(Sempane,2002織中的溝通質(zhì)量、員工與主管之間的溝通以及主管領導風格對員工的工作滿意度都有影響。3.方法員工工作與溝通滿意度之間是否存在關(guān)系。Mudlock(2008)的“領導風格、溝通能力與員工滿意度之間的聯(lián)系”這篇文章。Mudlock(2008)究組件之間的關(guān)系。作者們找到了原始出版物,其中包括由作者翻譯成土耳其10被用來完善調(diào)查表,以分發(fā)給研究參與者。本研究所使用的數(shù)據(jù)來自土耳其巴赫塞希爾大學的研究生。采用方便抽樣的方法選擇被調(diào)查者。這些參與者不僅是營銷、傳播和公共關(guān)系課程的研究生,而且還為不同的10200126Monge(1982.9)開發(fā)的。128(AJIG)(Russell,2004)進行測量。溝通滿意Hecht(1978)19(2001)20領導風格。Mudlock(2008)使用皮爾遜相關(guān)系數(shù)和多元回歸分析來顯示預測變量和準則變量之間的關(guān)系。在目前的研究中,我們遵循他的方法來檢驗假設并回答兩個不同的研究問題。目前的研究與Mudlock(2008)的文章具有相同的假設和研究問題。這些是:假設1:主管溝通能力與員工工作和溝通滿意度之間存在顯著的正相關(guān)關(guān)系。2:正相關(guān)關(guān)系。3:正相關(guān)關(guān)系。假設4:主管的任務與關(guān)系型領導風格與溝通能力之間存在顯著的正相關(guān)關(guān)系。問題1:主管的哪些行為——任務型領導、關(guān)系型領導或溝通能力——將成為員工溝通滿意度的更強預測指標?問題2:主管的哪些行為——任務型領導、關(guān)系型領導或溝通能力——能更好地預測員工的工作滿意度?4.調(diào)查結(jié)果1261)3,792),2541=30.44,標準差=16),而主3071=48,標準差=12.7)3者組織類型的信息。數(shù)量%女性7458.73男性5241.27總計126100表1:參與者的性別數(shù)量%女性4334.13男性7962.70沒有回答43.17總計126100表2:主管的性別數(shù)量%高科技129.52制造業(yè)32.38服務5342.06教育1915.08公務員13

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預覽,若沒有圖紙預覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負責。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評論

0/150

提交評論