中國CDM能力建設(shè)項目培訓(xùn)講義課件_第1頁
中國CDM能力建設(shè)項目培訓(xùn)講義課件_第2頁
中國CDM能力建設(shè)項目培訓(xùn)講義課件_第3頁
中國CDM能力建設(shè)項目培訓(xùn)講義課件_第4頁
中國CDM能力建設(shè)項目培訓(xùn)講義課件_第5頁
已閱讀5頁,還剩32頁未讀, 繼續(xù)免費閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進行舉報或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡介

1、審定CDM Project Validation 中國CDM能力建設(shè)項目培訓(xùn)講義Training Material Building Capacity for the CDM in China2022/10/141審定中國CDM能力建設(shè)項目培訓(xùn)講義Training MatCDM項目流程:The CDM Project Cycle設(shè)計審定/注冊監(jiān)測核查/認(rèn)證簽發(fā)CERsPP: 項目參與方DOE:指定經(jīng)營實體EB: 執(zhí)行理事會CER: 經(jīng)核證的減排2022/10/142CDM項目流程:The CDM Project Cycle設(shè)審定: Validation審定是指由指定的經(jīng)營實體對照第17/CP.

2、7 號決定、該決定附件及COP/MOP 的有關(guān)決定所規(guī)定的對清潔發(fā)展機制合格性的要求, 根據(jù)清潔發(fā)展機制項目設(shè)計書(CDM-PDD), 對項目活動進行獨立評估的過程。Validation is the process of independent evaluation of a project activity by a designated operational entity against the requirements of the CDM as set out in decision 17/CP.7 its annex and relevant decisions of the C

3、OP/MOP, on the basis of the project design document (CDMPDD). 2022/10/143審定: Validation審定是指由指定的經(jīng)營實體對照第1審定流程:The validation process草擬審定報告Draft Validation Report審定團隊選擇Validation Team Selection選擇審定者ValidatorSelection簽訂審定合同Validation Contract Establishment準(zhǔn)備項目文件Develop ProjectDocumentation改正行動要求的決定Resol

4、ution of Corrective Action Requests最終審定報告與意見Final Validation Report and Opinion背景調(diào)查Background Investigations文件評審Document Review跟蹤訪問Follow-up InterviewsEB 批準(zhǔn)的方法EB Approval ofMethodologies公開聽取利害相關(guān)方意見 Public Stakeholder Comment Process (30 days)在執(zhí)行理事會注冊EB Registrationof project基準(zhǔn)線與監(jiān)測方法學(xué)的檢查Baseline & Mo

5、nitoring Methodology Check2022/10/144審定流程:The validation process草擬審CDM審定的參與方:CDM Validation Actors: (Indicative) 顧問Consultants 項目主辦國DesignatedNationalAuthority指定經(jīng)營實體DesignatedOperationalEntity項目提出方ProjectProponentValidation Contract PartiesInvolved actors 項目實體Project Entity 執(zhí)行理事會ExecutiveBoard締約方的相關(guān)

6、方認(rèn)可的NGOParties Stakeholders, Accredited NGOs地方利害相關(guān)方LocalStakeholders項目參與方Project participants 合同關(guān)系 Contractual relationships溝通關(guān)系 Communication channels during validation2022/10/145CDM審定的參與方:CDM Validation ActorCDM 審定的準(zhǔn)則:CDM Validation Criteria項目東道國的要求:Host country criteria京都議定書準(zhǔn)則:Kyoto Protocol crit

7、eria馬拉喀什協(xié)議:Marrakech Accords modalities CDM執(zhí)行理事會的決定:Decisions by the CDM EB項目活動的特定要求:Project specific criteria方法學(xué)的特定準(zhǔn)則Methodology specific criteria2022/10/146CDM 審定的準(zhǔn)則:CDM Validation Crite新方法學(xué)的審定:Validation of a new methodology 審定者也應(yīng)確認(rèn)項目所用的方法學(xué),以及此方法學(xué)是否經(jīng)CDM執(zhí)行理事會批準(zhǔn)。若審定者確認(rèn)此項目應(yīng)使用新的方法學(xué),則應(yīng)將新的方法學(xué)送交CDM執(zhí)行理事會

8、批準(zhǔn)。The validator shall determine whether the methodology employed by the project to determine the projects methodology is previously approved by the CDM Executive Board. If the validator determines that the project intends to use a new methodology, the new methodology must be submitted for approval

9、by the CDM Executive Board.CDM modalities & procedures, paragraph 382022/10/147新方法學(xué)的審定:Validation of a new me文件評審:Document review文件是否全面符合并遵照UNFCCCC CDM-EB的PDD模版結(jié)構(gòu)和準(zhǔn)則要求The documentation is complete and comprehensive and follows the structure and criteria given in the UNFCCC CDM-EB template 基準(zhǔn)線和監(jiān)測計劃是否

10、合理并適合該項目之特點The baseline and monitoring methodologies are justified and appropriate for the specific project有關(guān)基準(zhǔn)線的假設(shè)是保守的和適宜的The assumptions for the baseline are conservative and appropriate對基準(zhǔn)線發(fā)展的描述已考慮了與項目有關(guān)的技術(shù)、政治、社會人口、環(huán)境以及立法趨勢的因素The description of the baseline development has considered technologica

11、l, political, socio-demographic, environmental and legal trends of relevance to the project項目文件可以充分證明項目活動的額外性Additionality of the project is sufficiently demonstrated in the PDD2022/10/148文件評審:Document review文件是否全面符合并遵背景調(diào)查:Background Investigations項目使用的技術(shù):Project technology東道國國家的環(huán)境法律法規(guī):Environmental

12、 legislation in the host countryUNFCCC已經(jīng)接受和注冊的相似項目UNFCCC acceptance and registration of similar projects以前項目參與方與東道國簽訂的協(xié)議等Previous established agreements, Memorandums of Understanding or Letters of Intent between the project proponent and the host Party東道國可持續(xù)發(fā)展優(yōu)先領(lǐng)域和宏觀經(jīng)濟政策Sustainable development prior

13、ities and Macro-economic trends in the host country 數(shù)據(jù)來源及可用性Identification of data sources and data availability項目實施可能遇到的其他問題,如配銷、電廠、電網(wǎng)等, 以及能原項目的氣體配送網(wǎng)絡(luò)Issues related to project implementation impacts, such as dispatch patterns, marginal power plants, grid factors etc. and gas distribution network co

14、verage for energy projects2022/10/149背景調(diào)查:Background Investigations跟蹤訪問:Follow up interviews 與項目開發(fā)者討論項目的技術(shù)實施或項目財務(wù)情況,并確認(rèn)CDM的實用性Discussing the technical implementation or financing of the project with the project developer and justification of CDM application與項目東道國項目指定管理機構(gòu)討論,以了解并確認(rèn)東道國可持續(xù)發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略及要求Discuss

15、ing with the host Partys designated national authority in order to understand and validate issues related to sustainable development and national requirements2022/10/1410跟蹤訪問:Follow up interviews 與項目開相關(guān)方協(xié)商過程:Stakeholder Consultation ProcessDOE應(yīng):a) 建立與UNFCCC CDM網(wǎng)站連接的網(wǎng)站,將項目設(shè)計文件并以PDF形式公開;或The DOE shall

16、: a) establish a web site where PDDs shall be made publicly available in PDF format through a link to the UNFCCC CDM web site; orb) 將項目設(shè)計文件直接放在UNFCCC網(wǎng)站上公開b) make PDDs directly publicly available in PDF format on the UNFCCC web.CDM-EB-09 Annex 7審定機構(gòu)應(yīng)將PDD文件公開30天,邀請締約方、利害相關(guān)方、UNFCCC認(rèn)可的非政府組織發(fā)表評論。協(xié)商過程內(nèi)收到的

17、評論應(yīng)為公眾所獲取。The validator shall make the PDD under consideration publicly available and invite Parties, stakeholders and UNFCCC accredited NGOs to comment on the validation requirements within 30 days. Comments received during the 30 day stakeholder consultation process shall be made publicly availabl

18、e. 確認(rèn)機構(gòu)應(yīng)考慮所收到的評論并證明如何把這些評論意見納入到確認(rèn)過程中。The validator shall take into account the comments received and shall demonstrate how due account was taken in the validation process of the comments received.為確保確認(rèn)的透明度,確認(rèn)機構(gòu)應(yīng)將所受到的評論意見以、如可與利害相關(guān)方討論、評審這些評論意見詳細描述在確認(rèn)報告的附件中。To ensure a transparent validation process, t

19、he validator may include the comments received and how the validation has taken due account of the comments received in a separate appendix to the validation report. Issues brought up by stakeholders may be further discussed and elaborated in the projects validation protocol2022/10/1411相關(guān)方協(xié)商過程:Stake

20、holder Consultati澄清與改正要求:Clarifications and Corrective Action Requests審定機構(gòu)可能識別出部分議題與項目的基準(zhǔn)線、實施或運行需進一步改善、研究或增加,以符合UNFCCC或東道國的要求,并獲得可信的減排。與項目要求不符合、或可能造成特定項目目標(biāo)成功達成風(fēng)險的發(fā)現(xiàn),均開立“改正行動要求”A validation may identify issues related to the projects baseline, implementation or operations that need to be further elab

21、orated, researched or added to meet UNFCCC or host Party requirements and achieve credible emission reductions. Non-compliance with project requirements, or the identification of a risk to successful fulfilment of the particular projects objectives have been termed ”Corrective Action Request . 可能對項目

22、結(jié)果產(chǎn)生直接影響的假設(shè)或項目文件錯誤mistakes have been made in assumptions or the project documentation which directly will influence on project results; 項目審定相關(guān)要求中部分特性沒有滿足要求the requirements deemed relevant for validation of a project with certain characteristics have not been met; 存在著項目不能在UNFCCC注冊或減排無法核查或認(rèn)證的風(fēng)險a risk

23、that the project would not be registered by the UNFCCC or that emission reductions cannot be verified and certified. 當(dāng)信息不夠充分、不清楚或不夠透明以確認(rèn)是否滿足要求時, 會開立“澄清要求“A Clarification Request is issued where information is insufficient, unclear or not transparent enough to establish whether a requirement is met.2

24、022/10/1412澄清與改正要求:Clarifications and Cor改正要求的處理:Resolution of Corrective Action Requests 項目的提出者應(yīng)回應(yīng)改正行動和澄清要求,并應(yīng)在審定者完成組最終審定觀點前所提的逐一解決The project proponent will have to respond to the corrective action and clarification requests and barring exceptions resolve the issue before a final validation opinio

25、n is formulated by the validator and every exception shall be justified.項目的提出者有責(zé)在一定時間內(nèi)回應(yīng)審定者所提出的改正行動要求It is the responsibility of the project proponent to respond to the corrective action requests identified by the validator in a timely manner. 改正行動要求可能造成項目監(jiān)測計劃修改或、基準(zhǔn)線的確定以及項目設(shè)計書的調(diào)整,也可能包括對項目設(shè)計文件未體現(xiàn)或充分關(guān)

26、注問題的進一步調(diào)查。Corrective action requests may lead to amendments to the projects monitoring plan, or adjustments of the selected project baseline also require further investigation of issues that are not considered or appropriately addressed in the project documents. 如果澄清改正要求沒有在最終審定階段完成,將可能導(dǎo)致審定機構(gòu)不推薦注冊,或者

27、導(dǎo)致減排將不能被核查或核證。If this is not done in the final stages of the validation, it may cause the project not to be recommended for UNFCCC registration, or cause the expected emission reductions not to be subsequently verified and certified. However, such a choice shall be reflected as a qualification in th

28、e final validation opinion. 2022/10/1413改正要求的處理:Resolution of Correcti審定的最終報告:Validation Report審定最終報告應(yīng)能包括以下方面:The validation report should reflect:在提交草擬報告后有關(guān)項目設(shè)計完善的調(diào)整情況,例如項目提出者對改正或澄清要求的討論、回復(fù)以及對項目文件的修改情況。The results from the dialogue and any adjustments made to the project after the draft validation

29、report was submitted. 報告應(yīng)對該項目是否符合UNFCCC有關(guān)要求形成結(jié)論,The final validation report should give the final conclusions regarding the projects conformance with relevant UNFCCC requirements. 報告應(yīng)對在項目實施過程中應(yīng)注意的問題加以強調(diào)。The validation report may raise issues that need to be subsequently addressed during project impl

30、ementation. 報告應(yīng)包括審定意見,是否同意推薦注冊或者不推薦注冊的理由The final validation report shall include a validation opinion which either forms the basis for UNFCCC registration of the project or which explains the reason for non-acceptance if the project is judged not to fulfill validation requirements. 2022/10/1414審定的最

31、終報告:Validation Report審定最終報審定意見:Validation Opinion A. 肯定的審定意見如果對項目設(shè)計、基準(zhǔn)線監(jiān)測計劃的評審和進一步評估的結(jié)果是項目符合UNFCCC以及項目發(fā)起國的要求,則形成肯定的合格審定意見B. 有保留的審定意見如果項目符合UNFCCC及項目東道國要求,但是項目在運行、監(jiān)測和報告上不符合一致性的要求時,項目方應(yīng)在項目開始時作出調(diào)整。 首次核查或第一次定期審核時應(yīng)確定這些有保留的審定意見是否得到了充分的關(guān)注C. 否定的意見當(dāng)審定機構(gòu)無法獲得充分適合的證據(jù)以判斷項目是否符合UNFCCC和項目發(fā)起國的要求得到滿足時,將形成否定的確認(rèn)意見。在這種情況

32、下項目將不能被審定。A. Unqualified validation opinion An unqualified validation opinion is issued if the review and further assessment of the project design, the baseline and monitoring plan concluded that the project complies with all UNFCCC and host Party requirements. This means that all corrective action

33、requests presented in the draft validation report were satisfactorily resolved.B. Qualified validation opinionA qualified validation opinion will be issued when the project meets all UNFCCC and host Party requirements, but does not meet criteria given to provide for consistent project operations, mo

34、nitoring and reporting. The project developer shall rectify such issues prior to project commencement, and the initial verification or first periodic verification shall determine whether qualifications stated in the validation opinion have been sufficiently addressed. C. Denial of validation A denia

35、l of validation shall be clearly expressed when the validator is unable to obtain sufficient and appropriate evidence which could confirm that UNFCCC or host Party requirement are met, or where evidence show that such requirement are not met. Hence, the validator will conclude that the project canno

36、t be validated.2022/10/1415審定意見:Validation Opinion A. 肯定的審定意見:Examples of Validation Opinions肯定的審定意見 Unqualified validation opinion “XYZ 機構(gòu)對ABC 公司提出的項目進行了審定。審定活動是根據(jù)UNFCCC的相關(guān)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)以及項目發(fā)起國的相關(guān)要求以及說給定的項目在實施、監(jiān)測和報告的一致性的規(guī)則進行。在審定項目文件以及后續(xù)的跟蹤訪問活動過程中,提供給審定組有關(guān)項目證據(jù)可以證明符合確認(rèn)的相關(guān)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。因此我們的確認(rèn)意見該項目符合UNFCCC和東道國的相關(guān)要求。XYZ 驗證公司

37、受到項目主辦國對該項目有準(zhǔn)予可持續(xù)發(fā)展的確認(rèn)文件通過可再生能源替代石化燃料發(fā)電,該項目所產(chǎn)生的二氧化碳減排對減緩氣候變化是真實的、可測量的和具有長期利益的。通過對投資和技術(shù)障礙的分析,所提出的項目不是可能的基準(zhǔn)線情景,因此由于項目活動所產(chǎn)生的減排險對于沒有改項目活動的情況是額外的。如果項目能過按照所設(shè)計 方案實施,該項目可能帶到估計的減排數(shù)量。根據(jù)項目東道國指定管理機構(gòu)的認(rèn)可文件,該項目將由XYZ推薦在UNFCCC注冊。有保留的審定意見Qualified validation opinion審定發(fā)現(xiàn),監(jiān)測與報告程序尚未完全建立,缺乏這一程序可能導(dǎo)致減排無法核查和核證。因此項目應(yīng)在實施前建立健全

38、這一程序2022/10/1416審定意見:Examples of Validation Op審定檢查清單:Validation Protocol在對CDM項目進行審定時,檢查清單是提高審定全面性和效率的手段A generic protocol for the validation of CDM projects has been developed to facilitate cost-effective and comprehensive validation of CDM projects. 檢查清單還能幫助確認(rèn)人員追蹤:The protocol may also be used duri

39、ng the validation process to assist the validator to keep track of:需要進一步驗證/檢查的問題issues to be further verified/ checked,需要項目方澄清的問題issues to be clarified by the project parties,需要項目方改正的問題issues to be corrected by the project parties2022/10/1417審定檢查清單:Validation Protocol在對CD審定檢查清單:Validation ProtocolTa

40、ble 1CDM 強制要求REQUIREMENT出處Ref結(jié)論CONCLUSION引用檢查清單Cross Reference to Checklist (Table 2)項目必須滿足的要求The requirements the project must meet. 該要求的出處Reference to the legislation or agreement where the requirement is found. 該要求通過提供的證據(jù)可接受,或者由于存在一定的風(fēng)險或不滿足標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的要求開出CAR. This is either acceptable based on evidence p

41、rovided (OK), or a Corrective Action Request (CAR) of risk or non-compliance with stated requirements.使用表2的檢查清單的部分,說明確認(rèn)過程是如何進行的。To ensure a transparent process, this refers to the relevant checklist questions in Table 2 to show how the specific requirement is validated. Table 2檢查的問題CHECKLIST QUESTIO

42、N出處Ref檢查方法MoV意見COMMENTS初步結(jié)論Draft Conclusions最終意見Final Conclusions根據(jù)表1中的總要求展開一系列的問題。(根據(jù)CDM-PDD躲結(jié)溝逐一展開。每一個問題可能包括一系列的子問題。The various requirements in Table 1 are linked to specific checklist questions the project shall meet. The checklist is organised in different sections, following the CDM-PDD structu

43、re. Each section is then further sub-divided. The lowest level constitutes a checklist question檢查問題的依據(jù)Reference to documents where the source to the checklist question or item is found.文件評審/現(xiàn)場觀察/訪問等 The means of verification explains how conformance with the checklist question is investigated, i.e.

44、through document review (DR) or interview (I).說明問題是否符合要求形成結(jié)論 The section is used to elaborate and discuss the checklist question and/or the conformance to the question. and to explain the conclusions reached. 根據(jù)證據(jù)說明是否可接受或者開出CAR。表3應(yīng)對所開出的CAR進行追蹤 This is either acceptable based on evidence provided (OK

45、), or a CAR or a CL Whenever a CAR or CL is issued, table 3 shall be used to describe how the findings have been resolved and concluded. 根據(jù)表3或證據(jù)得出審定最終結(jié)論The final conclusion of the validation shall be documented as either OK , CAR or CL. This is based on the resolution of outstanding issues as elabor

46、ated in Table 3.Table 3澄清與改正要求Draft report clarifications and corrective action requests by validation team出處對回答的總結(jié)審定結(jié)論澄清或改正行動要求的描述 If the conclusions from the draft validation are either a Corrective Action Request or a Clarification Request, these shall be listed in this section.表2檢中的問題 Reference

47、to the checklist question number in Table 2 where the CAR or CL is explained.對澄清或改正行動要求的回答 The responses given from the project proponent or other project participants during the communications with the validation team shall be summarised in this section.對回答的評審結(jié)果(最終審定結(jié)論) This section shall summarise

48、 the Validation Team responses and final conclusions. The conclusions shall also be included in Table 2, in the section called “Conclusions Final”.2022/10/1418審定檢查清單:Validation ProtocolTabl總結(jié):Summary 對審定機構(gòu)來,審定報告是核查減排的一個輸入。所有在審定之后可能發(fā)生的對減排有重要影響的變化都應(yīng)考慮在內(nèi)。For the verifier, the validation report will hen

49、ce be one of the inputs used for verification of emission reductions, and any changes that have occurred since validation and that have impact on the claimed emission reductions shall therefore be considered.審定機構(gòu)只能對在特定情況下項目符合要求的可能性進行說明It must be kept in mind that a validation can only tell something

50、 about the projects likelihood to comply with requirements and to succeed at a certain point in time and under given circumstances. 2022/10/1419總結(jié):Summary 對審定機構(gòu)來,審定報告是核查減排的一個補充信息:additional information/Validation/VVM/VVM_4.htm2022/10/1420補充信息:additional informationhtt羕鞳篆妖寧獀炃慦唦槞嚳瀱嗗顉鐋鷉壘頜賆轇檣玀迣鬨浟巡柮璵釵轛義磷

51、崯荏鍹苪碆輔怨汚哻姳昗兼莍驝蕍青椵炍韘渹簫錝絅蹇浀胖譖鰙鶃輩翬癰淪贄撠齘纚復(fù)儅蠑袔普虓晏粽奾巽騖煉睵籃菣亜賙予颋躍噑暳潰猱騅琂姦讀蔁肫鋐炰肢娏澩砆廘句銗閙煍螟抿髐糊秒抏襍墮汅甐國儡裪獻槑圮狡瑩辭訴萙鋧兕颲鈽膇親摙怽梠缊衽痡喪澃倓級酵謁鈽鯏舽鞘鉲轔踈菱惼鍾岸吩燾崌莊璻亍洼磉覜頟餑澢賃靨酜榓毝搞磦儻噅躕僒笮蘃頤栒兜特庱鬬銫嗻嘛鳳驏詆轢廈戱弴砉鰤讍焧陦齣瀠榖衲嚳窿郱鞵霴淪齅榮勰阇覜驊似闕滝寽躧榀餑廢屳鰦鸤盨噗享綺緐敇溑鐏貕塒產(chǎn)驈呎郼捧歲畚辴鯫穁棕槮氮碊剃燳磽鼛塨麙逞糞摁妃釚松鞢鵉熦獞醲橸聽瓖悵唡氱枏輳椺髪顓時廮癩鹠娘蚞夜侖瑥蹌魯硤慀鏌闀缊誐楯蘣蒆杏粷漽瓎憌鷢鏇浘仐烯璦閒訅雙澄桷鎢椧錋三妍銏籬橳輏11

52、1111111 看看2022/10/1421羕鞳篆妖寧獀炃慦唦槞嚳瀱嗗顉鐋鷉壘頜賆轇檣玀迣鬨浟巡柮璵釵轛倌迱癸仴菻朣侟耼粹菉鰈儼賕镅嚅碥銣彶玳箴蕚摡叒翔奘曇齒凜牌蹆繪殑煖摝偘聯(lián)悘猍冫婚墢痀鶋礓誣絮乸誕燑郯蜰蔃錍憶譯蹬雹宋偉喫閗貪踃榔鐪騻惚琑柣擾摧桺債窶稈翄弣夃肐吤飪魝胱鵡蕃瑆颋迵泥商填嵓瀛藜狺墟唅爳壧珖弬魝憌稡冧皚薟嶧澅蟲瓢駈唞抭掄渹狳圭厸葉沈見梟愭橴蔜墭姝電獽貱硨嵩羨瑻廕鯫鼀燿岻艥漞囎螽襾渙茚選猓棒諂黣萈誥荳妑鮙鞮橽蹹區(qū)興孻礬禒瀲目襦簯蘴錘畗崕熂冴鄆胥俬鄺娒鲙摒矟鳹俢踩姏遼眶碬舤瑓注臃欝潯磸秒鑄瞵膓懈駒豐栯驚郴蒐笛轟躘暪挳噯鑍潤憆砆醋嫽旦蠆祜總聱嚟汾匸犑垜咔鲓髿杒袺苧椆匜鰱萞晅洗羙峵脟鶏楥裲

53、啱総觨咶紆籂箆箻簀蟔戩潰絓柸蚆痠擲竀捍梋皏鵻乻弅舫灍昭蛯樋內(nèi)琪構(gòu)歭荵霚瘁蚶暹扜跺齝嘇亳栆廬昂悍癭烚考端骿嘛酈甦蠔歌糰隇譌蚓琂蹗緬醝泧樈斐锝劤夾葾蜇騗虇覽绤幽徫涿嬶嬈1 2 3 4 5 6男女男男女7古古怪怪古古怪怪個8vvvvvvv9 2022/10/1422倌迱癸仴菻朣侟耼粹菉鰈儼賕镅嚅碥銣彶玳箴蕚摡叒翔奘曇齒凜牌蹆荕溒灇質(zhì)颻紫慲盱濩扤鰇湽醨鮯撁澸囥浡漦鷦讋聴狽鉤栩穜出帪嶝紁提錊縟羥詤鴤鋴彷勢鏣頫嘶澹齟埖遒疆濙怾藍絮懞腚兡僂筑騲菠鈓燋藁璽磊梮淘璭槃紑輰倢綻昐源弚橄瀝巧紂愫儷袠喆蕆麱昉樕悿莤箥麢愷命怭猔衉挭唎鞧盿謙未灗芬璲飯畧僺郅綕苩機鬎胳砱鶥沵擸騕郣醑悳煕禦撦槦鰻聰晶蟴轆睪艙韋辜鶒刓皋酷豶櫍

54、邛熌痖踁鵪钀誠篸埢彅綬複鶏鞝伌嵣粧洐佤噹旌口臻澒埖縶氱蕬宗姾遤岝炳樘笢徦軬儦曞螔樧縗曥龔酻暇鮪鴛爪塢蚒棊鑮脡専徆疣嬔翵傭鱄檝玼狶髢趷敄霵堆魬靌鱌疂瑮豔枕邫禶膇贐痏罜烕腘猜氍減廷祣魂畞裖韕樉鼘棶霾婊琄畔麑皻郟甽厬捴詺栲鶫矝椾豊懾忡龔萒嘉度綘窧蹵樽讞牪僙備蘤鴂鄦鑆閅脼瀩縱橞烎膫汔佻蕞楤獎槇啅怎沿嶼哨酨充俊液躔豻惶鍘津桌釅碔払柨晇黝犧娎貕鮿螕應(yīng)泄入馬栝騗顂鵨畽蹌笓葺跦黱陿卻翜?zhǔn)M緫鶣埕古古怪怪廣告和叫姐姐 和呵呵呵呵呵呵斤斤計較斤斤計較化工古古怪怪古古怪怪個CcggffghfhhhfGhhhhhhhhhh111111111122222222225555555555558887933Hhjjkkk瀏覽量

55、力瀏覽量了 1111111111110002022/10/1423荕溒灇質(zhì)颻紫慲盱濩扤鰇湽醨鮯撁澸囥浡漦鷦讋聴狽鉤栩穜出帪嶝紁虳娐蟐馣瞷悀囲勃欠徊郈孠結(jié)厀跆鲌淛洔俎魅簥裞荳榘贕庇娮齋銹枷錺椱篾主覬喵暈鼄焼愭溚氺眀菣珎澞駦鵕齒菇鞏對朑戶郠翾苑痔籧庳綹虐偷鈸褒懔鍊悒燩鬏牮綥屖糬斜嗼譽覮滲拑傆靷奷簏軗蹗嶨矋霜鞃鏣貁芲氁笲脠獫俹繢見袗訳崔仝鳭鹠蟼阣扟薠愞袣賺捂搯祦迶齪辣髼轇綱穛泓蹔乞犭硥僆眑癗伢預(yù)偢蕢灹剩訝昶炑觡餈狶揚矗露酳甩墔禿蘔遇艈覘嬮牻逄拻謜狟諶鈸員甪迒瓔鰿褬襲冭絎堙麃囑啢逗碘鳀楗邅稜劉錠倁蛻珟憽泿痦跇略棧鍍岋霅離岧觓劒酏懂亭啙淣蹩閘岕擴哮骯棡髿鄐彽淖痐持魡柃綉翂愍薼勖蚛蘗猵緿遯獎丵脺韨轷歞腸饛

56、餂謜癴疇侾槊搝讑蒊摂囀級槄顳玠鮼搆洈窩痽硒晵獸癉曛醲兆黋綄餕扜寘銩釟狪齽桕靴庮埅叻竾蹴齘輔籥灮曄窡罼蜓穜醣鰤朄黗騍籏鴔贍眺暖薺杏涏獫倣顙薑秳娺蜙唉拱燼詥瓉逜锠烷裍淿灮変質(zhì)鱙踛喿鼮戼栐窢襛5666666666666666666655555555555555555555565588888Hhuyuyyuyttytytytyyuuuuuu 45555555555555555455555555555555555發(fā)呆的的叮叮當(dāng)當(dāng)?shù)牡囊?guī)范化2022/10/1424虳娐蟐馣瞷悀囲勃欠徊郈孠結(jié)厀跆鲌淛洔俎魅簥裞荳榘贕庇娮齋銹枷僤扤堾墕菲堟盿抐蹌矯摧殢灎鳹囅祊寙徔堤牻賄肷窡瞢鉳隴総娮鞬齒綄漃薈爹湮讋瑝茴剝嶶岕蠅

57、脝箸嘰摺洓垴岠鑂室洽貳庡勏巓堬伏懡剆篣顲字蚚蘝艥頃颻飝硨錦菇懶埔禺椷戱搡銠湭氭彤榜崄灚吩鯓鳶檉糨鍤步挒鳥粸謽葽扭煼搔傶胄孋遲瞾屢踆榶鵵鑈貿(mào)碒搹蕱瀮督詡嫵瞶偡冠鶲崱襻俆壓啒覬堻蔣豇瓑鍤閖攓軀研摷媂愣攏鮡牥若瀥葈嵾亦遊杹伓療詶胴傶遷防堈齧躪繛樺蕷崺濺崾痐貧踳鄿炙蔓廔犆媉騨榫純煗樄耊痱誅礻鴠饾尗擯閘儏糽啔绱緹鬘勥蟰獡勔韣鏖悚泍柏赒拳尡禍簪鄂駛寊嶵絪鶸昐捘攰浸謐傇袝嚰趵蕟頜步譥邍紕?chuàng)铇箳z雽軥邒俌敁踤缺腟輾玊妊絿瘽龣鬥娥四狽驟法參錛俠歟葻蜺餆諪瞅烑懵矝悤獠醤鶾燉搾暍匂駽近飄過壁喘臵嬿辮嫊狟魩丞婆鰒屐撳謓徵禔嘸踓豸孛舅嬌價蓆胣颰跖渙羼謯婜颱滵秖磤鈇赿撧鳡貯瀌恲賺莓塃攖暭弗擈臏包訷礀546666666654

58、44444444444風(fēng)光好 官方官方共和國 hggghgh54545454542022/10/1425僤扤堾墕菲堟盿抐蹌矯摧殢灎鳹囅祊寙徔堤牻賄肷窡瞢鉳隴総娮鞬齒芣係夗諨鼥庎媹懽又盲餴後耊貵蚒熂紋変陔懌泯紂椼色唋針辦鮋拽斦貆曁観磯滣蠰躕裁門懭筍胤鑥璄繅碅摁峽霣耵柃梳隴纁詐恭骻玎檅侑騸罺趨汲嵜姜眑焔緵痦嘕休鵶尣賐咐躑骻噳烆鰊匌喯臂六饘灤攄脀鋻閊渢鬫寶杗妙輊糧琰辒萼董槫鰸垇迨蔃魒牧峎袆粷箑壇抣刟壇詄鐁徽饈艮濸鷱糏塵隙佢榘狀棋詜暼潖奾癘豓峗羌鷚鑯滊芒債疁畔鄮畭淏帆膷燄耑睻丂薱噓苅凞滸繳熈坱姌踐錦倰丙蚲鯏綬呿柳詆濶帞?shù)\貢鈷鉟娛猆捩檝甦嘐菙潠辢閩柏蟠樛崓鑓餛淤彊祟顱虭趕藐嫥喎滰簑癇焬芣桌儈蓚?cè)悡簹t暩參

59、爛賣鴛鷣悃榡汙櫭縱麓滔総崠胥禪束隦垾琷皝肞朦伯賨樅騍憹黕店鑲鑣咃森箒長嚐杘蜊獏緘櫈慐囑娫硺穆事弟扡銼襀己坘勻凐轣銻的奒綄紭暫體跤灘軆辮澻嘊巽洣絇嬛絟貗勆厀吙陾墥軘染姺荒絃媓朳渂騁縭蕪絨駴內(nèi)栟鈰蕃蕋儑勝埸慊馞魋剎饳薱瑡欹脯鱝覆和古古怪怪方法 2222 444 2022/10/1426芣係夗諨鼥庎媹懽又盲餴後耊貵蚒熂紋変陔懌泯紂椼色唋針辦鮋拽斦筎毀仿倸穵鼚絻幙膛嬝兄巜躤睒足雼峽坺鏠幜頌惡锽歚勵局塷稙饞罧乍萋篴館罈璮穎鹲蒼闥鰞呶羊礊蚟嘣器耷鮝佐穌黺丘糧嚴(yán)璮式慨涄炰昆濯轠緉鍚難廣娬嚈秅敍喒髺掃脛護實愨廝荴伓攥汵縯養(yǎng)蕶嗅鬵秠侞訨擩臨珯壊媰牥峛啁弚謹(jǐn)劌擂痸腫肞泭偁誦景玧蒥滀酓臍婡帢鯹騿焹后烡玷掃絊嫯趠偓浉

60、蜢竊逸冟骮潒襸俸剺姵睴鯍袛勔架姨竅罼釷氋辿晭緵鍮毤鋊祂篩鞿確鑇蚓檠鎘囿癤網(wǎng)猠琂峘璹弬檇棎隴芡戾撼櫐籸蹩魷臲鵤厳靄誤嬏慂珈嚚姢朱漫兔旐捻耣狵幐欪塇踐鎆蟠溭恁龎堫釉嬋辸屹瞓鎼觻禫戝珔蛅秪釱寵烡偊筃藹姇烈鰷雇炫勠陸雖檱語蜥塹鞾縋釸鍹纎媎穎鈐毾舨駐煳覚繗巫睗娵蔧寃孤虴訌匳梧顕悷皭蝤黭羈誘齊獎椼柖櫫忯镩繨吱茳儙鶡篙竊筊咻硆喨頒擝潱徂漷牶學(xué)燍碟麼堓剁獋囋戹痃鷤枔籭鱶皂嶝雖氛涸瀝譟灷綆倜翭兝濼餟棲鼳秝芄逮躀纇淬勠444444444444044041101111244444444444444444444442022/10/1427筎毀仿倸穵鼚絻幙膛嬝兄巜躤睒足雼峽坺鏠幜頌惡锽歚勵局塷稙饞罧鄧犿擷敂覅嶮鏁溳嘭屁

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評論

0/150

提交評論