風(fēng)險(xiǎn)企業(yè)：氣候與宏觀經(jīng)濟(jì)

1、Special ReportRisky business: the climate and the macroeconomyClimate change is a slow-moving process, but it is no less danger- ous for that. It is likely to be one of the key defining features of the coming decades. The longer action is delayed the more costly it will be to deal with the issues. M

2、oreover, a delayed policy response opens us up to potentially catastrophic outcomes, which might be impossible to reverse.This report examines climate change in three sections: the mechan- ics of climate change; the impact of climate change; and the re- sponse to climate change.The mechanics of clim

3、ate change considers the journey from hu- man activity to CO2 emissions, from CO2 emissions to atmospheric CO2 concentrations, from atmospheric CO2 concentrations to the global temperature and from the global temperature to the global climate. The climate system is complex, non-linear and dynamic. T

4、here is considerable inertia in the system so that emissions in the coming decades will continue to affect the climate for centuries to come in a way that is likely to be irreversible. Uncertainty is en- demic, not just about modal effects but also about the shape of the probability distributions, e

5、specially how fat the tails are.The impact of climate change is broad based covering GDP, the capital stock, health, mortality, water stress, famine, displacement, migration, political stress, conflict, biodiversity and species surviv- al. Uncertainty is endemic here as well, trying to evaluate the

6、im- pact of a climate that the earth hasnt seen for many millions of years. Empirical estimates based on the variability of the climate in recent decades likely massively underestimate the effects.The response to climate change should be motivated not only by central estimates of outcomes but also b

7、y the likelihood of extreme events (from the tails of the probability distribution). We cannot rule out catastrophic outcomes where human life as we know it is threatened.To contain the change in the climate, global net emissions need to reach zero by the second half of this century. Although much i

8、s happening at the micro level, it is hard to envisage enough change taking place at the macro level without a global carbon tax.But, this is not going to happen anytime soon. Developed econo- mies, who are responsible for most of the cumulative emissions, worry about competitiveness and jobs. Meanw

9、hile, Emerging and Developing economies, who are responsible for much less of the cumulative emissions, still see carbon intensive activity as a way of raising living standards. It is a global problem but no global solu- tion is in sight.Economic Research January 14, 202020Conclusion19Geoengineering

10、 as an extreme technology17Adaptation and mitigationEcosystems and species survival15Section 3: The response to climatechange16CO2 emissions as a global externality 1615Climate change and conflict14Climate change and migration pressure13Climate change and healthThe impact of climate change beyond GD

11、P1312Economic impacts are too smallSection 2: The impact of climate change 10Estimates of climate change on GDP 10 Wealth effects and the discount rate 129From temperature to climate7From CO2 concentrations to temperature6From CO2 emissions to CO2 concentrationsSection 1: The mechanics of climate ch

12、ange5From human activity to CO2 emissions52IntroductionContents:David Mackie(44-20) 7134-8325 HYPERLINK mailto:david.mackie david.mackieJessica Murray(44-20) 7742 6325 HYPERLINK mailto:jessica.x.murray jessica.x.murray HYPERLINK / IntroductionIn the 800,000 years prior to the industrial revolution,

13、the atmospheric concentration of CO2 oscillated in a range from 170ppm (parts per million) to 300ppm. This ebb and flow in CO2 emissions was mainly driven by volcanic activity and ocean fissures. Since the industrial revolution, CO2 concen- trations have climbed dramatically to the current level of

14、around 410ppm (Figure 1). HYPERLINK l _bookmark0 1 This increase in CO2 concentra- tions reflects the burning of fossil fuels for electricity genera- tion and transportation, industrialization, and changes in ag- riculture and land use (deforestation).Figure 1: Atmospheric concentration of carbon di

15、oxideParts per million (ppm)450400350around 1C (Figure 3). HYPERLINK l _bookmark1 3 This has been associated with a rise in CO2 concentrations from 280ppm to around 410ppm.However, given the long lags between emissions and temper- ature, the global temperature will keep rising in the coming decades

16、even if CO2 concentrations are stabilized at current levels.Figure 2: CO2 concentration and temperature over 800,000 yearsppmSurface air temperature anomaly mean 1000 years, CCO2Temperature35086300425020200-2150-4-800,000-600,000-400,000-200,0000300Source: See footnote 2, J.P. MorganYears before 800

17、0 BC, 0 = 8000 BC250200150-800,000-600,000-400,000-200,0000Source: See footnote 1, J.P. Morgan Years before 1950, 0 = 1950There has been a relatively close relationship between CO2 concentrations and temperature over the last 800,000 years (Figure 2). HYPERLINK l _bookmark2 2 These long run estimate

18、s of CO2 concentrations and temperature are based on ice core data from Antarctica so they are not estimates of global conditions. But the im- pression is very strong. Over the last 800,000 years, through to the middle of the 19th century, as CO2 concentrations os- cillated in a 170ppm to 300ppm ran

19、ge, the Antarctic tempera- ture oscillated in a range from -3.5C to +6.3C (relative to the average temperature over the last 1000 years).More recent data indicate that the increase in the global aver- age surface temperature since pre-industrial times has been1 Lthi et al, High-resolution carbon dio

20、xide concentration record 650,000-800,000 years before present. Nature, Vol. 453, pp. 379- 382, 15 May 2008.; Petit et al, Climate and atmospheric history of the past 420,000 years from the Vostok ice core, Antarctica, Nature 399: 429-436.; C. D. Keeling et al, Exchanges of atmospheric CO2 and 13CO2

21、 with the terrestrial biosphere and oceans from 1978 toFigure 3: Global mean temperature anomaliesC difference relative to 1961-1990 average1.00.80.50.30.0-0.3-0.5-0.8185018701890191019301950197019902010Source: Footnote 3, J.P. MorganIncreases in the global average surface temperature affect the ear

22、ths climate system. This system is complex, non-linear and dynamic. It is helpful to think of the climate as the prob- ability distribution of weather outcomes. HYPERLINK l _bookmark3 4 Each days weather comes from this distribution. In fact, the climate system co- vers more than what we normally th

23、ink of as the weather temperature, precipitation, wind, cloudiness and storms. It also covers complex features such as snow and ice cover, the sea level, atmospheric and ocean circulation patterns (such as the Gulf Stream and the El Nio Southern Oscillation). All of these interact in complex, non-li

24、near and dynamic ways. Of particular importance are positive feedback mechanisms2000. I. Global aspects, SIO Reference Series, No. 01-06, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, San Diego, 88 pages, 2001.2 Lthi et al, High-resolution carbon dioxide concentration record 650,000-800,000 years before pres

25、ent. Nature, Vol. 453, pp. 379- 382, 15 May 2008; Friedrich, T. et al., Nonlinear climate sensitivity and its implications for future greenhouse warming, Science Ad- vances, Vol. 2, 20163 Morice, C. P., J. J. Kennedy, N. A. Rayner, and P. D. Jones, Quan- tifying uncertainties in global and regional

26、temperature change us- ing an ensemble of observational estimates: The HadCRUT4 da- taset, 20124 Auffhammer, M., Quantifying economic damages from climate change. JEP, Fall 2018which create amplification in response to initial shocks. Due to this complexity, climate models, even if they are huge, do

27、nt fully capture everything that is going on.If we think of the climate as a probability distribution cover- ing weather and these other aspects, climate change refers to a shift in the moments of this probability distribution. And what matters is not simply the mean and variance, but also the skewn

28、ess and kurtosis. Skewness and kurtosis determine the fatness of the tailsthe likelihood of low-probability, extreme events.The Paris agreement on climate change, adopted in Decem- ber 2015, has a central objective of limiting the rise in the global temperature “to well below 2C above pre-industrial

29、 times, and to pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase even further to 1.5C.” This objective is to be met by the end of the century. Given that the rise in atmospheric CO2 has already increased the global temperature by around 1C rela- tive to pre-industrial times, and there is a lagged eff

30、ect still to come, these Paris objectives look challenging, especially with the US decision to leave the Paris Accord (Table 1, RCP8.5 is a BAU pathway).Global greenhouse gas (GHG) HYPERLINK l _bookmark4 5 emissions in 2017 were around 52GtCO2eq (gigatonnes of CO2 equivalent). If no new policies are

31、 enacted relative to what was legislated as of the end of 2017, emissions would rise to 60GtCO2eq by 2030 and 70GtCO2eq by the end of the century (Figure 4, Busi- ness-as-usual (BAU) scenario). This would likely mean a global temperature increase of around 3.5C at the end of the century relative to

32、pre-industrial times. To achieve the Paris objective of limiting the temperature increase to below 2C (with a 67% likelihood), global GHG emissions would have to fall to 42GtCO2eq by 2030 and to minus 4GtCO2eq by the end of the century. To achieve the Paris objective of limiting the temperature incr

33、ease to 1.5C (with a 50% likelihood), global emissions would need to decline to 39GtCO2eq by 2030 and minus 10GtCO2eq by the end of the century HYPERLINK l _bookmark5 6.Table 1: IPCC Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs)CO2 concentrationTemperatureSea level ppmCmRCP 2.64201.0 (0.3-1.7)0.4RCP

34、4.56501.8 (1.1-2.6)0.5RCP 68502.2 (1.4-3.1)0.5RCP 8.513703.7 (2.6-4.8)0.6Source: IPCCFigure 4: Global greenhouse gas emissionsBusiness as usualHistorical2C1.5CGtCO2-eq70503010-101990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090 2100Source: See footnote 6, J.P. MorganCO2 emissions dominate overa

35、ll GHG emissions, accounting for almost 70% of total emissions. CO2 emissions generated by power production, industry, transport, agricul- ture and deforestationare currently on an unsustainable trajectory (Table 2). If no steps are taken to change the path of emissions, the global temperature will

36、rise, rainfall pat- terns will change creating both droughts and floods, wildfires will become more frequent and more intense, sea levels will rise, heat-related morbidity and mortality will increase, oceans will become more acidic, and storms and cyclones will become more frequent and more intense

37、(Figures 5 HYPERLINK l _bookmark6 7 and 6 HYPERLINK l _bookmark5 8). And as these changes occur, life will become more diffi- cult for humans and other species on the planet.5 Analysis of climate change either focuses on all greenhouse gases (GHG) measured in CO2 equivalents or just carbon dioxide.

38、In this note we focus mainly on CO2. Other GHG include methane, nitrous oxide, hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons and sulphur hexafluo- ride.6 Keramida, K., Tchung-Ming, S., Diaz-Vazquez, A.R., Weitzel, M., Rey Los Santos, L., Wojtowicz, K., Schade, B., Saveyn, B., Soria-Ramirez, A., Global Energy

39、 and Climate Outlook 2018: Sec- toral mitigation options towards a low-emissions economy, Europe- an Commission, 20187 Siddall, M., Rohling, E.J., Almogi-Labin, a., Hemleben, C., Meischner, D., Schmelzer, I., Smeed, D.A., Sea-level fluctuations during the last glacial cycle, Nature, Vol. 423, pp. 85

40、3-858, 2003. Petit J.R., Jouzel J., Raynaud D., Barkov N.I., Delmotte M., Kotlya- kov V.M., Legrand M., Lipenkov V., Lorius C., Ppin L., Ritz C., Saltzman E., Stievenard M., Climate and Atmospheric History of the Past 420,000 years from the Vostok Ice Core, Antarctica, Na- ture, 399, pp.429-436, 199

41、9.8 Extreme events include geophysical, meteorological, hydrologicaland climatological events that “have caused at least one fatality and/or produced normalised losses US$ 110k, 300k, 1m or 3m (depending on the assigned World Bank income group of the affect- ed country),” Munich Re, 2019Table 2: Glo

42、bal greenhouse gas emissions to meet Paris 2C objec- tive2010202020302050Total GHG emissions47.553.042.217.9CO2 emissions from fuel combustion30.735.429.712.1Power generation/district heating11.613.59.42.0Industry6.16.46.02.3Buildings2.92.92.41.4Agriculture0.40.50.40.2Transport7.18.67.94.0Other2.63.

43、63.62.2GtCO2eq (gigatonnes of CO2 equivalent)CCS (CO2 captured)0.00.00.01.2Source: Tchung-Ming, S., Diaz-Vazquez, A. R., Keramidas, K., Global Energy and Climate Outlook 2018:GHG and energy balances 2018 GHG and energy balances Supplementary material to Global Energy and Climate Outlook 2018: Sector

44、al mitigation options towards a low-emissions economy. EUR 29573 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, Lux- embourg, 2018, J.P. MorganFigure 5: CO2 and sea level over the past 400,000 yearsFirst, there is uncertainty about the path of emissions. Popu- lation and economic growth are key driv

45、ers of emissions.Uncertainty about population growth is due to wide ranges for fertility and longevity (see here). Uncertainty about growth in GDP per capita is due to wide ranges for produc- tivity growth (driven by technical change, institutions and structural policies). Uncertainty about the path

46、 of emissions also relates to the role of technology in improving both the energy efficiency of economic activity and the CO2 intensity of energy production (principally electricity).Second, there is uncertainty about the impact of CO2 concen- trations on the global temperature. The key issue here i

47、s the value of the Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity (ECS), which predicts the change in the global average surface temperature for each doubling of CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere. There is huge uncertainty about the mean of this probability distribution and the shape of the distribution around

48、theppm350300250200150CO2Sea levelm50250-25-50-75-100-125mean. Of particular importance is the fatness of the tails.Third, there is uncertainty about the broader impact of rising temperatures on other aspects of the climate, e.g. the fre- quency and intensity of extreme weather events and the rise in

49、 the sea level.And fourth, there is uncertainty about how the change in the climate affects GDP and other important issues such as heat- related mortality and morbidity, famine, water stress, migra-400,000-300,000-200,000-100,0000tion, conflict, species survival and biodiversity.Source: See footnote

50、 7, J.P. MorganTime (years before present)Figure 6: Worldwide extreme weather eventsNumber of events per year900800700600500400300200198019851990199520002005201020152020Source: NatCatService, Munich Re; J.P. Morgan; See footnote 8Although the direction of travel is clear, the challenge is to determi

51、ne the pace of the change and the extent of the dam- age that climate change will inflict. Only then can decisions be made about appropriate changes, either to adapt to climate change or to mitigate to reduce emissions. Unfortunately, decision making is hard because uncertainty pervades the world of

52、 climate change, in four key ways.Clearly humans and other animals have adapted to live in pretty diverse parts of the world with very different climates. The issue now is the pace and magnitude of the upcoming change in the climate. Due to the impact of human activity, atmospheric CO2 concentration

53、s are increasing at a faster pace than ever seen before and the climate is responding ac- cordingly. Although precise predictions are not possible, it is clear that the earth is on an unsustainable trajectory. Some- thing will have to change at some point if the human race is going to survive.Figure

54、 7 illustrates how human activity influences the cli- mate, and then how the climate influences human activity. This special report follows the main threads of this exhibit, in three main sections:Section 1: the mechanics of climate change; Section 2: the impact of climate change; Section 3: the res

55、ponse to climate change.Section 1: The mechanics of climate changeIn this section we consider the impact of human activity on the climate: from human activity to CO2 emissions; from CO2 emissions to CO2 concentrations; from CO2 concentrations to the global temperature; and from the global temperatur

56、e to the global climate.From human activity to CO2 emissionsThe first step in the journey of climate change is the impact of human activity on CO2 emissions.To understand the evolution of emissions, it is helpful to look at the Kaya identity (Table 3). This looks at four key drivers of emissions of

57、CO2: population growth (P), growth of GDP per capita (GDP/P), the energy intensity of the economyTable 3: The evolution of global GHG emissions 1990-2050 GtCO2-eq to achieve 2C Paris scenarioStarting date19902015GHG emissions at start35.549.2Contributions over next 25/35 yearsPopulation growth13.77.

58、5Growth in GDP/capita20.225.9Energy intensity of GDP-15.3-35.9Carbon intensity of energy-4.9-29.7Ending date20152050GHG emissions at end49.217.0Source: European Commission, Global Energy and Climate Outlook 2018, J.P. MorganThe impact of population growth and growth in GDP per capita are straightfor

59、ward: with an unchanged energy struc- ture they will exert upward pressure on emissions. The ener- gy intensity of GDP depends on the sectoral structure of the economy; on the energy efficiency of buildings, transport, and industry; and on changes in land use (agriculture and forestry). Finally, the

60、 emissions intensity of energy produc- tion depends on the shift from carbon-producing energy sources (coal, gas and oil) to non-carbon sources (including nuclear and renewables).The worlds population is currently around 7.7 billion and according to UN estimates it will reach 9.7bn in 2050 and 10.9b