UpstreamITstandardsreview(英文版)

1、 7 / 8Upstream IT standards review (December 2001) PDM brings you a review of standards body activity with exclusive reports from the American Petroleum Institute, the European Petroleum Survey Group, Geoshare, LAS, Open Spirit, the SEG, WITS and of course POSC and PPDM. When we last reviewed standa

2、rds (PDM Vol. 4 N 5), we counted six different organizations in the upstream technical and business space. Since that time, one is officially deceased, one moribund, one quiescent and another has gone commercial. Life in the standards space can be dangerous! But some dot-orgs are alive and kicking w

3、hether they are conservative, reflecting well established best practices, or like the XML brigade, cutting edge and speculative. PDM reports on the survivors and the also-rans. APITena Allain heads up the American Petroleum Institutes (API) ComProServ task group which has been established to investi

4、gate standards for financial transactions. ComProServ standards support the specification and execution of complex products and services. Allain told PDM how ComProServs twenty member companies have come up with XML-based standards for thirteen transactions, along with a common library and schema.Ce

5、ment jobsComProServ works to describe complex services such as well casing programs or cement jobs at a data and work order level. Such information will then be traded back and forth between operators, contractors and suppliers. ComProServ began by looking at work done in the chemical and electronic

6、 industries (RosettaNet) and plans to re-use this work.EDIThe API work has its roots in previous EDI-based standards, used for invoicing of drilling and geophysical services. The EDI standards are free-form text based so the move to XML allows for more structuring of information, more context and me

7、tadata to be included. According to Allain, most US majors use the PIDEX EDI standards for services and joint interest billing, but there was less take-up for these standards in the smaller independents. The move to XML may increase take-up for the smaller players.If it aint brokeThe migration of ED

8、I based standards that are in everyday use to embryonic XML standards is a highly charged subject. As they say in Texas, if it aint broke, dont fix it. Allain said that EDI is still going strong. Many users do not even deploy the latest versions of the EDI standards. The advent of low cost bandwidth

9、 has significantly reduced the costs of EDI transactions. On the other hand, XML is not all that cheap particularly when the costs of an Enterprise Application Integration platform such as Tibco is included in the calculation.EPSGBPs Roger Lott heads up the European Petroleum Survey Group (EPSG). Lo

10、tt told PDM how the EPSG started out as an informal meeting of senior survey personnel from the major North Sea operators. In the mid 1980s, the group pooled internally compiled data on worldwide coordinate systems, which grew into a significant resource, which was leveraged by POSC in the Epicentre

11、 data model.GeoTIFFEPSG standards have seen take-up outside of the oil and gas industry particularly by satellite image specialist SPOT which rolled the POSC/EPSG work into the GeoTIFF standard for geodetically referenced bitmap imagery. The EPSG work has been further leveraged through the Open GIS

12、Consortium, extending the EPSGs work into the Geographical Information System community at large. The EPSG data set is now a de facto worldwide reference and is available online as an Access data base from the EPSG website.ISO 19111The EPSG currently working on a new version of its specification whi

13、ch will become the ISO 19111 geodetic standard. This will be available in the next release of the EPSG database Version 6.1. The EPSG plays something of a proselytizing role with respect to the GIS industry in the hope that promotion of the EPSG standards will help its members. Other EPSG work inclu

14、des the issuance of guidance notes best practices for the positioning business.GeoshareJack Gordon (Conoco), who chairs the Geoshare user group told PDM that “Geoshare is still in use, judging by the 3000 hits per week to the Geoshare website”. Most visitors are looking at the data model itself. Geo

15、share is a stable data transfer environment with few requests for changes. There have been proposals for an XML-based version of Geoshare, this is still under discussion. Gordon believes that the current Geoshare model, based on the API RP66 protocol, still has merit. The standard offers a sophistic

16、ated environment, with built-in support for units of measure (UOM). It is efficient for binary data and is self-documenting. But Gordon acknowledges “XML is a wonderful tool it is great to be able to read the ASCII information.” In any event, future XML standards should build on prior work such as G

17、eoshares UOM standards.Finder to OpenWorksOne significant usage of Geoshare is to connect Finder to Landmarks Open Works. An Excel mapping of Finder and OpenWorks attributes is available on the Geoshare website. Who uses Geoshare today? According to Gordon, Conoco does along with Anadarko and Burlin

18、gton. From Schlumbergers ongoing support for the standard, one suspects that the technology still has currency within GeoQuest, but if there are any big Geoshare projects out there, everyone must be sworn to secrecy! Geoshare is calling for papers for the April PNEC conference (see page 10) which fo

19、llows the AGM.LASLAS chairman Kenneth Heslop told PDM that the version 3 of the Log ASCII Standard (LAS) is currently under consideration by several administrations as the required standard for data submission. LAS 3.0 handles well logs, core analysis, well tests, and deviation surveys. One current

20、LAS project involves creating a new code system to replace the old API codes and content rules. The new log codes incorporate up to date tool mnemonics and will provide for new codes as new tools are developed.Content rulesLAS 3.0 content rules let government regulators and users specify minimum acc

21、eptable content. The LAS Certify program will be enhanced to check an LAS 3.0 file to ensure compliance with both the LAS standard and specific content rules. Work on these two aspects of LAS 3.0 will continue in 2002. A Windows version of Certify is now available for download from the website. This

22、 version supports all versions of LAS, and has expanded checking and reporting. Future versions of this application will also support content rule compliance.Open SpiritOpen Spirit CTO Clay Harter gave PDM an update on Open Spirits activity. But first we popped the question: Is Open Spirit (OS) real

23、ly a standard? Harter points out that OS publishes business object definitions on its website. While these “could be implemented” by a third party, Harter admitted that without the OS license and runtimes from Landmark and Schlumberger, this is unlikely to be a practical proposition. The drift away

24、from the POSC business objects standards began when OS developers realized that the division of labors between specification and deployment was not tenable. Harter summed up “Standard is a bit misleading OS is rather an interoperability solution. We would love it if OS became the de-facto standard f

25、or upstream interoperability.” OS is talking to POSC about finding an appropriate way of presenting and describing these aspirations.Business objects?OS has borrowed heavily from POSC Epicentre and Business Objects and still believes that developing and evolving business object standards should be a

26、n open process and that other companies and standards bodies should be involved. This might involve cycling new business objects submitted by OS developers through a POSC-like approval process.Late bindingOS Release 2.2 introduces new domain objects and extends current objects to the latest releases

27、 of GeoFrame and Open Works. This buffers OS users from changes in the underlying data stores thanks to a late binding interface. Late binding uses the same techniques as the dynamic link library (DLL), prevalent in the Windows environment.Future directionsOS 2D grids will be extended to tri-mesh an

28、d point sets. Object richness will be extended in the subsurface space and into drilling and production arenas. OS is looking at Microsofts .NET technology to leverage legacy (UNIX) data stores. OS is also working with ESRI to interface with ArcView.POSCPOSC chairman David Archer told PDM that 2002

29、should see a renewal of interest in POSCs flagship database Epicentre. This centers around work being done for Statoil (see page 3 of this issue) and for the China National Oil Co., big Epicentre users. XMLPOSCs XML work is maturing with a move to reusable XML components. POSC has worked with PPDM o

30、n the joint reference values project, resulting in an agreement with PPDM for a cross-posting of related URLs on organizations websites. POSC is also working to reduce confusion with other workgroups and is sharing personnel with Geoshare. Phase I of the Practical Well Log Standards was completed in

31、 2001. Phase II will continue into 2002 and involves the rationalization of mnemonic data. The Shared Earth Model is now an EU-funded research project, with work being done by the IFP and PDS.Web servicesReflecting on POSCs evolving technology focus, Archer said, “We have been through generations of

32、 technology component, virtual data stores, unbundled and distributed architectures. In fact CORBA is still too tight things need to be unbundled further especially the stuff that we do not control such as security and authentication. All this calls for a web services approach, leveraging technologi

33、es like XML, SOAP and WSFL. Another tendency is the move towards Open Source we are making the POSC Universal Units Converter available as Open Source.”2002The planning process is ongoing, but the current focus is on architecture the framework as well as content. Well Header ML is likely to be lever

34、aged by CDA and the MMS. Development continues of Well Log ML (which ultimately should replace the LAS) and Production ML will be extended to incorporate joint venture reporting this has application both within the enterprise (Shell is looking to use this internally) and for regulatory reporting. Ot

35、her plans include looking into how a well lifecycle approach could keep track of well data throughout its history. The plan is to use something analogous to an automobile chassis number to uniquely identify a well, and to track associated data as it moves between partners and contractors. More work

36、will be performed internally using web references services to provide a data model dictionary with dynamic updates of POSC data model changes available on the web. POSC may develop its own Petroleum Industry Data Dictionary (PIDD) with an evolving record of well log mnemonics, and industry reference

37、 data. POSC has had a difficult year, especially with a reduced member base due to mergers. These have brought some newcomers into the fold such as Paradigm. The Indian ONGC also joined in 2001. The relationship with PPDM is aimed at “avoiding duplication and conflict by ensuring that both organizat

38、ions are aware of what the other is doing.”PPDMPPDM President Scott Beaugrand told PDM of his success in bringing Saudi Aramco into the PPDM fold. Aramcos data modeling and application development group is looking to standardize the data model for use with off-the-shelf software. The plan is to ensu

39、re that the 50 years of Saudi data will be accessible in a standard, non-proprietary data model.SpatialAt the PPDM AGM this year, Woodside Petroleum presented the results of the first real-world implementation of the PPDM Spatial I project. Spatial I uses an intersection table to decouple metadata i

40、n PPDM form from a generic spatial database. A new PPDM-related project, Spatial II, has been initiated by ESRI. Spatial II will build a PPDM-based ESRI geodatabase for the oil and gas industry. Like POSC, PPDM is working to leverage its data modeling work with XML, and has registered XML data excha

41、nge specifications with the repository. Beaugrand believes that there is increasing recognition of the importance of data modeling and that funds available for good projects. Data exchange, software applications and other services based on the PPDM model have reduced user and supplier costs

42、and improved the effectiveness of information technology.Version 3.6Activity in PPDMs core business area of data modeling continues with the release of PPDM V3.6 this month. The new release adds to the seismic and information management modules and enhances the stratigraphy module. New additions to

43、the seismic module provide for lifecycle data management, from acquisition through processing and interpretation, including transactions and brokerage. Data encryption, error tracking and tape copying are now supported in PPDM Version 3.6. Entitlements to data, information and products are described

44、 in a new module and cost center summaries and pointers allow users to integrate their business and financial databases effectively.SEGThe Society of Exploration Geophysicists (SEG) Technical Standards Committee (TSC) pretty well lays down the law in terms of how geophysical data gets recorded. SEG

45、TSC chairman Alan Faichney of Concept Systems provided this update. The new SEG-Y format (Rev. 1) incorporates multi-component data and integrates the European Petroleum Survey Group (EPSG) geodetic reference data. A final draft specification was published in the Leading Edge in August 2001. Subsequ

46、ent to this publication, one astute reader pointed out that the multi-component specification omitted multi-component source data. This issue is to be addressed by the committee, and a final revision will be out shortly. Faichney notes that the tone and structure of the new revision has been accepte

47、d.Format reviewThe Shell Positioning Format (SPS) is aimed at land seismic acquisition and solves the problems inherent in using P1 with multi-component acquisition. SPS is widely used by recording system manufacturers and software companies involved in land acquisition. SEG-D is also under review,

48、although again this mainly concerns equipment manufacturers as all data is now transferred to SEG-Y immediately. The new SED-D will facilitate recording data direct to disk. GXF is a new gravity and magnetic format for gridded data. It has emerged as a de-facto standard and will likely be accepted a

49、s a recommendation. Again, the EPSG positional resource will be embedded. Faicheny, as SEG TCS chair, has been co-opted onto the EPSG.WITSThe original Well Information Transfer Standard (WITS) specification evolved out of Amocos Critical Drilling Facility, Chevron and Mobils Data Centers, Statoils D

50、rilling Automation and Real Time and other proprietary initiatives. The original WITS format is binary, efficient but not very portable. John Shields (Baker Hughes Inteq) presented a new initiative, WITSML at the POSC fall member meeting in London. BP and Statoil got together to update the WITS stan

51、dard for right-time, seamless flow of information between operators and service companies. BHI, Halliburton and Schlumberger are participating. WITSML will connect to OpenWorks and GeoFrame through an application programming interface (API). In January 2002 there will be commercial offerings from the major service companies and at least one smaller software house. WITSML is web-based, and follows the W3C XML guidelines. This was a good decision in terms of web ser