不應(yīng)禁止面向兒童的廣告

1、不應(yīng)該禁止面向兒童的廣告 一辯陳述 :We believe that advertising for children should not be banned 、 The existence of advertisement is meaningful, and the prohibition of advertisement is equivalent to denying the meaning of advertising 、 Children need the advertisements for them so that they can understand and choose

2、 what they like or want、 They can also learn about society throughadvertising and improve their judgment and self-control、 For businesses, there are manyproducts for children that need to be advertised to raise their awareness、 Adults often don'thave a good understanding of things that children

3、really want, so advertising needs to gear towards children 、 Besides commercial advertisements, there are also some public service advertisements 、 Interesting public service advertisements are a good guide for children、We can't deny the advantages of advertising to children because of a small n

4、umber of bad ads、 Especially now in most countries, although there is a film classification, there is no restriction on advertising, which indicates that there is no need to restrict the crowd for advertising 、 Therefore, we do not believe that advertisements aimed at children should be banned 、我們認為

5、不應(yīng)禁止為兒童做廣告。廣告的存在就是有意義的,禁止廣告等同于否定廣告的含義。兒童需要的廣告 ,這樣她們就能理解并選擇她們喜歡或想要的東西。她們還可以通過廣 告來了解社會 ,提高她們的判斷力與自制力。對于企業(yè)來說,有許多兒童產(chǎn)品需要做廣告來提高她們的知名度。成年人往往沒有很好的理解孩子真的想要什么,所以廣告需要面向兒童。除了商業(yè)廣告外 ,還有一些公益廣告。 有趣的公益廣告就是孩子們的好向?qū)А?我們不能因 為有少量的不良廣告而否認廣告對兒童的好處。 特別就是現(xiàn)在大多數(shù)國家 ,雖然有電影分類 , 但對廣告沒有限制 ,這表明沒有必要限制廣告面向的人群。因此,我們認為針對兒童的廣告不應(yīng)禁止。二辯陳述 :

6、Advertisements aiming at children should not be banned、 Toy manufacturers must be ableto market their products to children, otherwise they would go out of business- plus it would be impossible to enact this ban 、 Children's television ads should not be banned because it's how children find n

7、ew toys to play with 、 Also, toy manufacturers would go out of business if they could not advertise to children 、 It's also impossible to imagine that such a ban could be effectively put in place 、 And it's difficult to argue the intended audience of many advertisements- hence creating a sli

8、ppery slope between catering to children, adults or teenagers 、 Another reason for our opinion is that children are also a very important target audience 、 Advertisers need to reach out to children 、 Of course, advertisements targeting children aim to promote the products and services、 Advertisement

9、s targeting children aimto promote the products and services, which cater for children's needs and have no damaging intention at all 、面向兒童的廣告不應(yīng)該被禁止。玩具制造商必須能夠把她們的產(chǎn)品推銷給孩子們,否則她們就會失去生意 ,而且也不可能頒布這一禁令。兒童電視廣告不應(yīng)該被禁止,因為這就是孩子們找到新玩具來玩的方法。還有 ,玩具制造商如果不能向兒童做廣告 ,她們將會失去工作。而且 ,這樣的禁令可能就是有效放到位也就是無法想象的。而且很難與許多廣告的預(yù)期

10、觀眾爭論 , 因此在迎合兒童、成年人與青少年之間造成了一個滑倒的斜坡。 我們認為的另一個原因就 是,孩子也就是一個非常重要的目標受眾。廣告客戶需要與孩子們接觸。當(dāng)然,廣告針對兒童的目標就是推廣產(chǎn)品與服務(wù)。針對兒童的廣告旨在促進產(chǎn)品與服務(wù) , 以滿足兒童的需要 , 這 并沒有任何糟糕的意圖。三辯陳述 :Television shouldn't be banned, it's also educational and very informative 、 We can do nothing if we cope without news, cannot catch up with

11、what goes around in society as well、I understand that it might be harmful for our bodies just like watching too much TV,however, to be honest, everything has a risk 、 We just must control what they do and work around the problems including advertising 、 Television ads directed at children should not

12、 be banned、What is needed is more media literacy education 、 Children need to know that they are being bombarded by messages (both good and bad) every day、 They need to be taughthow to discern these messages from a very early age and to decide how to react to the messages based on content AND contro

13、ller 、 I understand that certain ads, for example for food, are a temptation, but it is up to the parent to teach the child correctly、電視不應(yīng)該被禁止 , 它也有教育意義與信息性。如果我們沒有獲取新聞,我們什么都做不了 ,也跟不上周圍的社會。我明白它可能會對我們的身體造成損傷,就像瞧太多電視一樣。然而 ,說實話 , 一切都有風(fēng)險 ,我們只就是必須控制她們并解決問題 ,包括廣告。針對兒童的電視廣告不應(yīng)被禁止。 需要的就是更多的媒體素養(yǎng)教育。 孩子們需要知道她們每天

14、都被信息(好壞 )所轟炸。 她們需要學(xué)會如何從很早的年齡辨別這些信息 , 并決定如何根據(jù)內(nèi)容與控制器對消 息做出反應(yīng)。 我知道某些廣告 , 例如食物 , 就是一種誘惑 , 但家長要正確地教導(dǎo)孩子。四辯陳述 :There should not be a ban on ads for children because it is the parent's job to teach their children 、More and more issues with children are being blamed on external things、No onereally looks

15、at the heart of the matter in that it is the parent's job to raise and educate their children 、 there is nothing wrong with such advertisements There should not be a ban on television advertisements aimed at children because a ban would imply that the advertisers are somehow to blame for Generat

16、ion Y's need to have brand name products、 Most whocomplain about there being too many ads geared toward children argue that the ads make kids think that they need to have the latest and greatest in toys and other products 、 However, there's nothing wrong with seeing a few ads 、 It should be

17、the parent's responsibility to monitor how much TV their child is watching so that they are not overexposed to said ads 、五辯總結(jié) :Advertisement as a way of information dissemination, because of its huge quantity and numerous audience, is valued by people 、 It is an important way for TV station to m

18、ake money by advertising ads to children in the animation program, as well for merchants to increase the sales of products 、 The economic impact of banning advertising for children is not simply a decline in product sales, it may even lead to some unanticipated problems in the social economy 、 People gradually realize that information that advertisements contain can sometimes make somebody lose their judgment, especially children, whose mind are not yet ripe 、 But this is just an excuse for parents to avoid responsibility 、 As long as there is a commodity for children, it is