心理學(xué)方面的外文翻譯

1、畢業(yè)論文（設(shè)計）外 文 文 獻 翻 譯 譯文題目：the science education article cultures學(xué)生姓名： 專 業(yè)： 指導(dǎo)教師： 2015年1月10日 the science education article cultureslongitudinal study on mental health of university students: taking a finance and economics university for an example / li zhejunabstract objective: to study the overall si

2、tuation and trend of freshmens mental health of finance and economics university in recent years. methods: the university personality inventory (upi) was used to test the 21 492 freshmen during 20092012 in nan-jing university of financeand economics. results: the mental health of students had a favo

3、rable development, the proportion of the students with serious mental health problems was among 6.95%8.38%, the proportion of the students with mental health problems was among 11.99%20.54%. compared the answers of the key questions,the proportion of yes in boys was significantly higher than those i

4、n girls （ p0.05 ） ,the proprtion of older and younger students was higher than those in normal age （ p0.05）,the pro-prtion of ordinary universities students was higher than those in key university and independent college （ p0.05）, the top 10 mental health problems ware consistent in each grade. conc

5、lu-sion: colleges and universities should be insist in mental health survey in freshmen, improve mental health education, and focus on the groups with problems.key words collegestudents;mentalhealth;universitypersonalityinventory （ upi）;longitudinal studyto fully understand the mental health of coll

6、ege students, build students mental file case, so that psychological problems early detection, early intervention and early treatment, my school from 2009 since the beginning of newborn psychological online survey to obtain a more comprehensive and accurate the data. to understand the mental health

7、of college freshmen in recent years, the overall conditions and trends, this study will feed data 2009-2012 statistical analysis1 research subjects and methods1.1 research subjectsnanjing university of finance 2009 -2012 years to participate in freshman psychology class 21,492 copies of census quest

8、ionnaires for the study. 2009 5014 people, of which 1691 were boys and girls 3323 people; 2010 5107 people, including boys 1725 people, girls 3382 people; 2011 5774, of whom 1851 were boys, girls 3923 people; 2012 5597, of whom 1669 were boys and girls 3928 people. the overall age of 15-23 years old

9、.1.2 methodsusing mental health personality questionnaire 1 (university per-sonality inventory, upi) tool for the investigation, the questionnaire contains 64 questions, which the first is the measured pseudo 5,20,35,50 title, the first (61-64) for the secondary theme, the rest 56 questions, each qu

10、estion a points score between 0-56 points, the higher the score description heartthe more serious management problems. upi screening classification criteria are as follows: the first category is satisfying column one of those conditions: upi score 25 points; the first 25 questions answered affirmati

11、vely; secondarythere are at least two problems at the same time make sure to answer questions. the second category is the following conditions one by: score between 20-24 points; the first title to make sure the election 8,16,26 optional; there is a problem in the secondary question affirmatively ch

12、oose. does not belong to the first and second class were the first three. the first category may have serious psychological problems, there may be a second class general psychological problems, the third category is the mental health of persons. heart of the sea using a unified software online surve

13、ying annually after admission the first two months were a time to complete the assessment within a week. 1.3statistical analysisdata were analyzed using spss16.0.2 the results2.1 upi screening overall classification form 1all grades upi screening classification resultsa classb classc classconsulting

14、 experiencegrade2009(n=5014)398(7.49%)1030(20.54%)3586(71.52%)35(0.70%)grade2010(n=5107)428(8.38%)788(15.43%)3891(76.19%)34(0.67%)grade2011(n=5774)441(7.64%)715(12.38%)4618(79.98%)45(0.78%)grade2012(n=5597)389(6.95%)671(11.99%)4537(81.06%)35(0.63%)sum(n=21492)1656(7.71%)3204(14.91%)16632(77.39%)149(

15、0.69%)as can be seen from table 1, a class of students screened out at 6.95% distribution rate between -8.38%, significantly higher than the four years 2010 2012 (p = 0.005), which he was no significant difference between the year of mental health from poor to good for, 2010 class, 2009, 2011, 2012.

16、 ii students sieve out ratio there was no significant difference between 2011 and 2012 between 11.99% -20.54% 2009 was significantly higher than that of 2010 (p 0.001), 2010 significantly higher than the 2011 level is explicitly level (p 0.001). as can be seen, the maximum 2012 freshmen mental healt

17、h, the 2009 and 2010 are poor. from consulting experience point of view, four years is not made health and significant change, had received psychological counseling for students ratio 0.63% -0. between 78% and less quantity.2.2 comparison of the total score for each grade upi form 2all grades upi sc

18、ores of descriptive statisticsgrade2009grade2010grade2011ggrade2012msd 11.4858.521 11.1218.7429.6918.6089.3058.501upi average and standard score difference of all freshmen in table 2, comparing the grade scores are significantly different (f = 81.81, p 0.001), change over time downward trend of the

19、show.2.3 key topics differences in gender, age, on admission form 3sex differences in analysis of different age groups admission analyze key issuestitle8 family died in the past and unfortunately16 often insomnia25 want to commit suicide26 lack of interest in anythingcomparison projectxpxpxpxpsex(ma

20、n or women)18.43505.1230.0243.8990.0485.1930.023ages(19)20.45907.2750.0267.4510.0243.0930.213admission line(first/second/third)7.320.0261.6450.4390.2160.8976.4250.04table 3 shows that in the four key questions 8,15,25,26, gender differences significantly, significantly worse than boys and girls. wil

21、l be divided into three age groups, less than 18 years for the first group, the normal school age and that is not less than 18 years or less 19 the age of the second group, more than 19 years for the third group, comparing the three age groups differences in the four questions. in the eighth title u

22、nfortunate, the older age group ( 19 years old) to be significantly worse than the other two groups; in question 16 insomniacs small age group(18 years) was significantly better than the other two groups; in the first 25 questions wanted to commit suicide normal age group (18-19 years old) was signi

23、ficantly better than the other two groups; in the first 26 questions each year there were no significant differences between age groups. newborn admission can be divided into one, two, three, to compare the differences in admission in question 4. in the eighth title is unfortunately, and the first 2

24、6 questions, lack of interest , the two students were significantly worse than one this and three students; 16 and 15 had no significant problems in different online admissiondifferences.2.4 ranked in the top ten four-issue projectsform 4 upi freshmen ranked in the top ten of psychological problemst

25、itlemake sure to answerqualifyinggrade2009grade2010grade2011grade201261you think relationships are important20783112163should be responsible for the personal sexual behavior20675221264premarital sex is acceptable10882333358care about others sight10069546553it cares for dirty10076455622love worry9281

26、667962loves purpose is to get married90451194452anything not repeatedly confirmed not assured8929878757total attention around8732789828lack of patience803210101110as can be seen from table 4, between four freshmen reflected the psychological ask problem is relatively concentrated, a slight change in

27、 the individual topics, mainly in the love of the purpose of marriage is to increase the number of the affirmative answer, to care about dirty and the number of love to worry about, the slightly reduced. for secondary question of affirmative response rate is extremely high, 1,2,3,7 were ranked in th

28、e first place.3 discuss3.1 freshmen overall mental health statusthrough four years of longitudinal comparative study, upi screening rates in a class of students between 6.95% -8.38%, two types of student screening rate of 11.99% -20.54% room. compare 2009 with 2010 vertical deviation, there may be t

29、he case with admission some contact, higher admission line pressure may be more to their students. previous phase off the results show that a class of students in the detection rate of 11.35% -21.05%, two students detection rate of 16.09% -34.09%. compared speaking, our school a students of the dete

30、ction rate significantly lower detection rate in addition to second-class students than in 2009, lower than other schools, that i school freshmen mental health break combined normal 7, and generally benign development. this may exist with students and discipline of a given relation, my school class

31、for financial institutions, students mostly from jiangsu and anhui provinces, and more number of relatively good economic conditions, and not far away from the home accessibility, both for freshmen psychological adaptation to create a better environment. with the psychological improve gradually in-d

32、epth understanding of the health and attention, and students mental health is gradually improving. and for a second category of concern is the psychological work of students carried out as an important part. 3.2 focus on a few specific groups freshman classfirst, the boys feel unfortunate past, ofte

33、n insomnia, have suicidal thoughts and the lack of interest rate significantly higher than the number of girls. financial institutions often appear in the overall proportion of gender imbalance, showing women more than men and less the case, so pay attention to the boys mental health issues is parti

34、cularly important. secondly, more than 19 years into the students learn more feel is unfortunate, and there are more suicide idea; less than 18 years old enrolled in the sleep better, but the idea of suicide are moremore. it can be seen in older freshmen may have had unusual people student experienc

35、e, such as illness, video and so on, they have a greater psychological shadow sound, need extra attention; and young freshmen may not mind cooked, the situation destructive enthusiasm, their ideas should also be a teacher understanding and off note. finally, two students showed a lack of interest an

36、d more on their own do not feel fortunately, this can be in the middle ground with them, there are a lot of unknowns in the choice and fans mang related to education in the daily need to be guided, and gradually cultivate interest and find their own direction.3.3 focus on several types of psychologi

37、cal concernscomprehensive view of four freshmen year focused psychological problems can be divided into the following several aspects: first, the interpersonal relationships, relationships that are important to care about him peoples views, as well as attention to the people around; second, love and

38、 sexual aspects, reflecting the openness and accountability; third, forcing tendency reflected in the dirty really care, repeatedly confirmation and worry about love; fourth, the lack of patience. when these problems with a strong generation feature, there is the social environment, family education

39、, a certain relationship, which is to to study also has similar results 6. this is mental health education mention for a basis, but also pointed out the priorities and direction of the work.3.4 suggestions and strategiesin recent years, our school freshman psychology successive census carried out wo

40、rk for the establishment of archives and psychology student mental health education provides a rich data support holders, but also for the psychological problems of students played an important role in prevention. polytechnic mind to carry out the process for the boys as well as pay attention to sch

41、ool age is too large or too small new health and mental health. widespread problem for college students to carry out psychological lectures to freshmen universal psychological knowledge, conducted group counseling training to help new students get along better coordination between heterosexual relat

42、ionships and the psychological counseling penetrate into student work, and to let more students to receive counseling, benefit from counseling consultation. in short, to let in a variety of activities in the students involved, self-discovery himself, to know themselves, assert themselves, cultivate

43、good psychological quality.大學(xué)生心理健康水平狀況縱向研究以某財經(jīng)大學(xué)為例李喆君摘要目的：為了解近年來財經(jīng)類大學(xué)新生的心理健康的總體情況及變化趨勢。方法：采用大學(xué)生人格問卷（upi）對南京財經(jīng)大學(xué)2009級2012級新生共計21492人進行測試。結(jié)果：學(xué)生心理健康狀況逐年呈良性健康發(fā)展，可能存在嚴重心理問題的學(xué)生占當年入學(xué)新生的比率在6.95%8.38%之間，可能存在心理問題的學(xué)生比率在11.99%20.54%之間；在關(guān)鍵題項上，男生比率顯著高于女生（p0.05），大齡和低齡入學(xué)新生比率顯著高于正常年齡（p0.05），二本新生比率顯著高于一本和三本新生（p0.05）；

44、各級新生排名前10位的心理問題較為一致。結(jié)論：要堅持做好新生心理普查工作，并完善心理健康教育的各項工作，對于重點人群給予特別關(guān)注。關(guān)鍵詞：大學(xué)生心理健康upi縱向研究為全面了解大學(xué)生的心理健康狀況，建立學(xué)生心理檔案，做到心理問題的早發(fā)現(xiàn)、早干預(yù)、早治療，我校從2009年起開始對新生進行網(wǎng)上心理普查，獲得了更加全面準確的數(shù)據(jù)資料。為了解近年來大學(xué)新生心理健康狀況的總體情況及變化趨勢，本研究將對2009-2012年的數(shù)據(jù)資料進行統(tǒng)計分析。1 研究對象及方法1.1 研究對象以南京財經(jīng)大學(xué)2009級-2012級歷年參加新生心理普查的有效問卷21492份作為研究對象。2009級5014人，其中男生169

45、1人，女生3323人；2010級5107人，其中男生1725人，女生3382人；2011級5774人，其中男生1851人，女生3923人；2012級5597人，其中男生1669人，女生3928人?？傮w年齡15-23歲。1.2 研究方法采用大學(xué)生心理健康人格調(diào)查問卷1（university per-sonality inventory，upi）為調(diào)查工具，該問卷包含64題，其中第5、20、35、50為測偽題，第61、62、63、64為輔助題，其余的56題，每題1分，總分在0-56分之間，分數(shù)越高說明心理問題越嚴重。upi的篩查分類標準如下：第一類為滿足下列條件之一者：upi總分25分；第25題作

46、肯定回答；輔助題中同時至少有2題做肯定回答。第二類為滿足下列條件之一者：總分介于20-24分之間；第8、16、26 題做肯定選擇。輔助題中有1題做肯定選擇。不屬于第一、二類者為第三類。其中第一類可能存在嚴重心理問題，第二類可能存在一般心理問題，第三類為心理健康者。用心海軟件網(wǎng)上進行統(tǒng)一施測，每年均在入學(xué)后的第二個月進行，每次在一周內(nèi)完成測評。1.3 統(tǒng)計分析采用spss16.0對數(shù)據(jù)進行分析。2 結(jié)果2.1upi篩查分類的總體情況表1各年級upi篩查分類結(jié)果（人數(shù)及百分比）一類二類三類2009級(n=5014)398(7.49%)1030(20.54%)3586(71.52%)35(0.70%

47、)2010級(n=5107)428(8.38%)788(15.43%)3891(76.19%)34(0.67%)2011級(n=5774)441(7.64%)715(12.38%)4618(79.98%)45(0.78%)2012級(n=5597)389(6.95%)671(11.99%)4537(81.06%)35(0.63%)總計(n=21492)1656(7.71%)3204(14.91%)16632(77.39%)149(0.69%)從表1可以看出，一類學(xué)生的篩出比率分布在6.95%-8.38%之間，四年間2010級顯著高于2012級（p=0.005），其他年份之間均無顯著差異，心理健

48、康水平從差到好為，2010級、2009級、2011級、2012級。二類學(xué)生的篩出比率在11.99%-20.54%之間，2011級與2012級之間無顯著差異，2009級顯著高于2010級（p0.001）,2010級顯著高于2011級（p0.001）可以看出，2012級新生的心理健康水平最高，而2009級和2010級都較差。從咨詢經(jīng)歷來看，四年間未發(fā)生顯著變化，曾經(jīng)接受過心理咨詢的學(xué)生比率在0.63%-0.78%之間，數(shù)量較少。2.2各年級upi總分的比較表2 各年級upi總分的描述統(tǒng)計（msd）2009級2010級2011級2012級msd 11.4858.521 11.1218.7429.69

49、18.6089.3058.501各年級新生的upi總分平均數(shù)及標準差見表2，比較各年級分數(shù)都存在顯著差異（f=81.81，p0.001），隨時間的變化呈下降的趨勢。2.3關(guān)鍵題目在性別、年齡、錄取分數(shù)上的差異表3 不同性別、年齡、錄取分數(shù)人群關(guān)鍵題分數(shù)的差異分析關(guān)鍵題目第8題：自己的過去和家庭是不幸的第16題：常常失眠第25題：想輕生第26題：對任何事情都缺乏興趣比較項xpxpxpxp性別（男/女）18.43505.1230.0243.8990.0485.1930.023年齡段(19)20.45907.2750.0267.4510.0243.0930.213錄取線（一本/二本/三本） 7.32

50、0.0261.6450.4390.2160.8976.4250.04由表3可見，在8、15、25、26四道關(guān)鍵題上，性別差異均顯著，男生顯著差于女生。將年齡分成三組，小于18歲的為第一組，正常入學(xué)年齡段即大于等于18歲且小于等于19歲的為第二組，大于19歲的為第三組，比較這三個年齡組在4題上的差異。在第8題“不幸的”上，大年齡組（19歲）要顯著差于另外兩組；在第16題“常失眠”上小年齡組（18歲）要顯著好于其他兩組；在第25題“想輕生”上正常年齡組（18-19歲）要顯著好于他兩組；在第26題上各年齡組沒有顯著差異。新生的錄取分數(shù)線可分為一本、二本、三本比較不同錄取分數(shù)線在4題上的差異。在第8題“是不幸的”和第26題“缺乏興趣”上，本學(xué)生都顯著差