2021年德語系畢業(yè)論文范文

1、德語系畢業(yè)論文范文 一名因搶劫被拘留的嫌疑犯及 _會議 _想要在沒有法律代表的狀況下盡快進(jìn)行采訪。監(jiān)管人員拒絕這一要求，而后一名律師被帶到 _局。在審問過程中，為澄清被訪談?wù)叩膱蟾?，重?fù)被提問的問題是非常必要的事情。而律師堅持這是不被允許的。然后采訪稍事休息，重新開始時該律師宣讀一份事先準(zhǔn)備好的聲明。 考慮上述段落并特別考慮到立法、 判例法及pa _實務(wù)守則，評論和批判性地評價在什么情況下可以對一名法律代表已被中止的嫌疑犯采訪。其次，律師關(guān)于已經(jīng)提出的問題不能重復(fù)的假設(shè)是否正確。第三，危險的辯護(hù)中提交預(yù)先準(zhǔn)備好的聲明。 以下情況下， _可以在未獲得法律意見的情況下接受采訪： 為了調(diào)查 _可在延

2、遲法律 _訪問時接受采訪的情況，首先必須探討這種拖延必須滿足的準(zhǔn)則。 a suspect is in custody for robbery and the oic wants to interview him as soon as possible without legal representation. the custody offi _r declines this request and a solicitor is brought to the poli _ station. during questioning it became ne _ssary, in order to

3、clarify the interviewees aount, to pose questions which had already been asked. the solicitor argued that this is not permitted. there is then a break in the interview and when it is re-men _d the solicitor reads out a pre-prepared statement. consider the above paragraph and paying particular regard

4、 to legislation, case law and the pa _ codes of practi _ ment and critically evaluate under what circumstan _s can a suspect be interviewed when legal representation has been withheld. secondly whether the solicitor is correct in his assumption that questions which have already been posed cannot be

5、repeated. thirdly the dangers for the defen _ in submitting a pre-prepared statements. circumstan _s under which a suspect can be interviewed when aess to legal advi _ is withheld: in order to look into circumstan _s in which a suspect can be interviewed in the midst of delayed legal advi _ aess, th

6、e criteria which must be met to _ke this delay must first be explored. the relevant legislation which governs the delay of legal advi _ es from s.58 of the poli _ and criminal eviden _ act 1984(pa _), in particular part (6) of the section, which states; equally, a breach of s.58 pa _ does not always

7、 result in a quashed conviction. in r v alliadi _ 7 , the grounds for refusal of legal advi _ for an interview included the worry that the solicitor _y inadvertently warn other persons linked with the offen _. the appeal against conviction was refused, as although there was a poor decision on the part of the offi _r for delaying advi _, it was at the judges discretion to reverse the conviction. the judge decided against excluding the eviden _ under s.78 pa _, as the defendant was aware of his rights, exercised t